One Hundred Nights
    Back to Emerging Tools
    Productivity & Scheduling

    Ting for Nonprofits: AI Email Scheduling Assistant

    An emerging AI tool that coordinates meetings directly in email threads without scheduling links. Simply CC Ting and it handles the back-and-forth of finding meeting times—ideal for nonprofits seeking more natural scheduling coordination.

    New & Emerging Tool

    Ting is a newer AI tool (or new to us). We recommend thorough evaluation and testing before full implementation.

    We've researched this tool as thoroughly as possible, but some information may become outdated and/or incorrect as smaller/newer companies can evolve quickly, including changing prices and features. There may be some inaccurate and dated information here.

    Visit TingGet Implementation Help

    What It Does

    If you've ever exchanged five emails just to schedule a 30-minute call, you understand the problem Ting solves. Traditional scheduling tools require sending links that feel impersonal and add friction to relationship-building conversations. Email-based coordination feels more natural but becomes time-consuming when multiple people are involved.

    Ting operates entirely within your email threads. When you need to schedule a meeting, you simply CC [email protected] in your email conversation. The AI reads the thread context, checks connected calendars for availability, suggests appropriate meeting times, coordinates responses from all participants, and sends calendar invites—all without requiring anyone to click scheduling links or download apps.

    For nonprofits, this means staff can schedule donor meetings, board calls, volunteer coordination, and partner conversations using the same natural email flow they're already comfortable with, while eliminating the administrative burden of manual calendar coordination.

    Best For

    Recommended For

    • Small to mid-sized nonprofits (5-50 staff) comfortable with experimentation
    • Google Workspace users who primarily use Gmail and Google Calendar
    • Teams frustrated by scheduling links who want more personal coordination
    • Organizations with technical capacity to troubleshoot occasional issues
    • External-facing roles (fundraising, partnerships, recruitment) that prioritize relationship-building

    Not Recommended For

    • Microsoft 365 organizations (Outlook support not yet available)
    • Large nonprofits requiring enterprise SLAs and guaranteed reliability
    • Teams without technical troubleshooting capacity or IT support
    • Mission-critical scheduling where errors could have serious consequences
    • Organizations requiring extensive training resources or consultant support

    What Makes This Tool Different from Established Alternatives

    The Established Alternative: Most nonprofits use scheduling tools like Calendly, Acuity, or Microsoft Bookings, which generate booking links that recipients click to select available times. These tools are reliable and feature-rich but require everyone to leave the email conversation to schedule meetings—creating friction in relationship-building contexts.

    What Makes Ting Different

    Email-Native Scheduling

    Coordinates meetings entirely within email threads

    Instead of sending scheduling links, Ting operates directly in your email conversations. You CC the AI assistant, and it understands the context of your thread—whether you're scheduling a first donor meeting, coordinating multiple stakeholders, or rescheduling a postponed call. The AI suggests times naturally within the conversation, just like a human assistant would.

    Practical Impact:

    • Eliminates the friction of asking contacts to "click this link to schedule"
    • Maintains the personal, conversational feel of email-based coordination
    • Works with any contact—no app downloads or account creation required

    Context-Aware AI Coordination

    Understands conversation context, not just calendar slots

    Traditional scheduling tools present available time slots without context. Ting's AI (built on Google's Gemini LLM) reads the entire email thread to understand the meeting purpose, urgency, participant preferences, and constraints mentioned in the conversation. Over time, "Ting Memories" learns your scheduling patterns and preferences.

    Practical Impact:

    • Suggests times appropriate to conversation context (e.g., "urgent" = sooner availability)
    • Adapts tone and formality to match your communication style
    • Learns preferences like preferred meeting times, typical meeting lengths, and buffer needs

    Zero Friction for Meeting Participants

    Recipients need no tools, accounts, or technical steps

    When you schedule with Calendly or similar tools, recipients must click links, navigate to external pages, review availability grids, and manually select times. With Ting, participants simply reply to the email naturally—the AI handles everything else. This is particularly valuable when scheduling with board members, major donors, or senior partners who may find scheduling links impersonal or cumbersome.

    Practical Impact:

    • Higher response rates from busy or senior contacts who prefer email
    • More personal feel strengthens relationship-building (especially important for fundraising)
    • Works universally—no accessibility concerns about external scheduling platforms

    The Trade-Off

    To achieve this email-native innovation, Ting makes different choices than established scheduling tools:

    ✅ What You Gain:

    • • Natural, personal scheduling within email
    • • Context-aware AI coordination
    • • Zero friction for meeting participants
    • • Currently free for core features
    • • No scheduling links or external pages

    ❌ What You Give Up:

    • • Beta-level reliability (errors possible)
    • • Limited calendar support (Google only, Outlook coming)
    • • Smaller user community and knowledge base
    • • Less mature documentation and support
    • • Must trust AI with email access
    • • No extensive integration ecosystem

    Bottom Line: Choose Ting if email-native scheduling and personal feel are priorities and you have tolerance for beta-level maturity. Choose Calendly, Acuity, or similar tools if you need proven reliability, extensive integrations, and comprehensive support.

    Key Features for Nonprofits

    Intelligent Calendar Coordination

    Ting connects to Google Calendar to check real-time availability across your team. When you CC Ting on an email thread, it automatically:

    • Checks all participants' calendars (if they've connected Ting) to find mutual availability
    • Detects timezones automatically and suggests times appropriate for all participants
    • Proposes multiple time options when perfect overlap isn't available
    • Sends calendar invites automatically once times are confirmed

    Nonprofit Use Case: A development director scheduling donor cultivation meetings can CC Ting when coordinating with a major gift prospect. Ting checks the director's and Executive Director's calendars, suggests times that work for both internal staff, and coordinates with the donor—all without the donor needing to navigate scheduling software.

    Ting Memories: Learning Your Patterns

    Over time, Ting's AI learns your scheduling preferences and adapts its suggestions:

    • Preferred meeting times: If you typically schedule donor calls in the mornings, Ting prioritizes morning slots
    • Meeting duration patterns: Learns typical lengths for different meeting types
    • Communication tone: Adapts formality to match your style with different contacts
    • Buffer preferences: Recognizes if you need breaks between meetings

    Nonprofit Use Case: A program manager who consistently schedules volunteer orientation on Tuesday evenings will find Ting automatically suggesting Tuesday evening slots for future volunteer meetings, reducing the back-and-forth coordination.

    Multi-Platform Communication

    While email is the primary interface, Ting also supports scheduling through:

    • WhatsApp: Schedule meetings via WhatsApp messages (useful for international partners or communities that prefer WhatsApp)
    • SMS: Text-based scheduling for contacts who prefer phone communication
    • Multi-language support: Works in English, Portuguese, French, Spanish, German, and Italian

    Nonprofit Use Case: International development organizations working with partners in Latin America or Europe can coordinate meetings in Spanish, Portuguese, or French using WhatsApp—the communication channel their partners already use daily.

    Automatic Rescheduling & Cancellations

    When plans change (as they often do in nonprofit work), Ting handles the coordination:

    • Reschedule requests: Simply reply to the thread asking to reschedule; Ting suggests new times
    • Cancellation handling: Notifies all participants and removes calendar events
    • Follow-up coordination: Continues the conversation to find alternate times

    Nonprofit Use Case: When a program director's site visit gets postponed due to weather, they can reply to the original email thread with "We need to reschedule due to the storm," and Ting will coordinate new times with all stakeholders without manual calendar management.

    Ting Relationships (Early Access)

    An emerging feature that provides lightweight CRM functionality:

    • Meeting history tracking: View all past meetings with each contact
    • Contact context: Access conversation history before meetings
    • Relationship insights: Understand communication patterns with key contacts

    Note: This feature is in early access and may evolve significantly. It's not yet a full CRM replacement but offers useful context for relationship-building roles.

    Usage Analytics Dashboard

    Track the time savings and efficiency gains from using Ting:

    • Meetings scheduled: Total count of meetings coordinated by Ting
    • Hours saved: Estimated time savings vs. manual coordination
    • Emails reduced: Count of back-and-forth emails eliminated

    Nonprofit Value: These metrics help justify the tool adoption when reporting to leadership or boards about operational efficiency improvements.

    How This Tool Uses AI

    Many scheduling tools claim "AI-powered" features, but Ting's AI usage is central to its functionality. Understanding exactly what the AI does—and doesn't do—is critical for nonprofits evaluating this emerging tool.

    What the AI Actually Does

    Ting is built on Google's Gemini large language model (LLM) and uses Google's Vertex AI infrastructure:

    • Natural Language Understanding: The AI reads email threads to understand meeting intent, participant roles, urgency signals, and constraints mentioned in conversation. It's not just parsing structured data—it's comprehending natural human communication patterns.
    • Context-Aware Scheduling: Based on conversation content, the AI suggests appropriate meeting lengths, formality levels, and time suggestions. For example, "quick chat" triggers shorter meeting slots, while "quarterly review" suggests longer blocks.
    • Multi-Party Coordination: When multiple participants are involved, the AI tracks each person's availability, preferences expressed in the thread, and constraints, then synthesizes a proposal that works for everyone.
    • Adaptive Tone Matching: The AI analyzes your communication style and adjusts its responses to match your formality, brevity, and tone—making its coordination feel natural within your existing communication patterns.
    • Pattern Learning: Over time, the "Ting Memories" feature uses machine learning to identify your scheduling habits, preferred times, typical meeting structures, and buffer preferences—improving suggestions automatically.

    What the AI Doesn't Do (Despite Marketing Language)

    • Not Perfectly Accurate: The company explicitly states "Meet-Ting can make mistakes. Always check your availability for meetings." The AI interprets natural language but can misunderstand intent, especially in complex or ambiguous threads.
    • Not Fully Autonomous: While marketed as handling scheduling automatically, you still need to verify bookings, especially for important meetings. The tool augments human judgment rather than replacing it completely.
    • Not Predictive of External Factors: The AI can't predict when someone will cancel, anticipate schedule changes, or factor in external events affecting availability unless explicitly mentioned in email threads.
    • Not a Full CRM: While "Ting Relationships" offers contact insights, it's not replacing dedicated nonprofit CRM systems. It provides context, not comprehensive donor management.

    Privacy & Data Processing

    Because Ting's AI reads your email content to function, data privacy is critical:

    • Email Access: Ting reads emails where it's CC'd (not your entire inbox). However, those threads may contain sensitive donor information, board discussions, or confidential program details.
    • Processing Location: Free tier uses Google's Gemini LLM for processing; enterprise tier offers Vertex AI with additional privacy guarantees. Data is processed by third-party AI models.
    • Training Data: Ting claims they "don't train on your data," but the privacy policy mentions using aggregated, anonymized data for product improvement—standard practice but worth understanding.
    • Future Advertising: Privacy policy mentions potential "time-based advertising" (opt-in claimed), suggesting possible future business model changes.

    Recommendation: For general staff scheduling, Ting's privacy approach is likely acceptable. For highly sensitive scheduling (board executive sessions, confidential donor conversations, legal matters), consider whether you're comfortable with AI processing that content or stick with traditional scheduling tools.

    Early Adopter Experiences

    As a newer tool (or new to us), verified nonprofit case studies are limited. However, early adopter reviews from small businesses and professionals in similar coordination roles provide useful insights into real-world performance.

    Verified Early Adopter Feedback

    Based on Product Hunt and Trustpilot reviews from 2025-2026

    What's Working Well:

    • Onboarding Speed: Multiple users report setup taking "less than 2 minutes" to get started, with "smooth and effortless" initial experience.
    • Elimination of Scheduling Links: Users consistently praise that "no more back and forth emails" and the tool "just sorts everyone's diaries out and makes meetings happen."
    • Context Understanding: Reviews highlight that Ting "actually understands context and handles the messiness of real email threads better than most humans."
    • Reduced Friction: Early adopters report the tool "replaced every scheduling tool I used before" because "you just CC it and move on with your life."

    Challenges Reported:

    • Limited Review Volume: Only 2 detailed reviews on Trustpilot, indicating very limited user base and feedback so far.
    • Beta Status: Users acknowledge the tool is in beta with the company warning "errors may occur" and "occasionally something might break."
    • Email Delivery Issues: Company acknowledges "rarely, corporate email filters can be strict," suggesting some coordination emails may get filtered as spam.
    • Platform Limitations: Currently only works with Google Calendar/Gmail—users with Outlook must wait for future support.

    Representative User Quote:

    "Meet Ting has made my life so much easier. No more back and forth emails and stressing about who can do what and when. It just sorts everyone's diaries out and makes meetings happen!"

    — Trustpilot Review, 2025

    Important Context About This Feedback

    • Limited Sample Size: Very few public reviews available—not enough to assess long-term reliability or identify systematic issues.
    • No Verified Nonprofit Users: Available reviews are from general users, not nonprofits specifically. Nonprofit needs (donor confidentiality, complex stakeholder coordination) may differ from general business use.
    • Beta Status Caveat: Positive experiences reflect current beta users—those willing to experiment with newer tools. Your experience may differ if you need production-level stability.
    • Sources: Feedback compiled from Product Hunt reviews, Trustpilot reviews, and startup press coverage.

    Pricing

    Free Plan

    Currently Available

    $0/month

    No credit card required

    • Unlimited meeting scheduling via email
    • WhatsApp and SMS scheduling
    • Google Calendar integration
    • Automatic rescheduling and cancellations
    • Ting Memories (learning preferences)
    • Multi-language support (6 languages)
    • Usage analytics dashboard

    Plus Plan

    Coming Soon

    TBD/month

    Pricing not yet announced

    • Everything in Free plan
    • Custom AI tone and style
    • Branded email signatures
    • Multiple inbox support
    • Unlimited usage (no restrictions)
    • Priority support

    Details subject to change as product matures

    Enterprise Plan

    Pilot Program Available

    For larger nonprofits or organizations requiring enhanced privacy and support:

    • Vertex AI processing: Enhanced privacy guarantees vs. standard Gemini LLM
    • Dedicated support: Priority access to the Ting team
    • Custom integrations: Tailored connections to nonprofit systems
    • Team features: Multi-user coordination and organization-wide settings
    Contact for Enterprise Pricing

    Pricing Notes for Nonprofits

    • Free tier is genuinely useful: Unlike many freemium tools, Ting's free plan includes core functionality without artificial limitations—suitable for most small nonprofit use cases.
    • No nonprofit-specific pricing yet: No dedicated nonprofit discounts or special programs currently available. The free tier may be sufficient for many organizations.
    • Pricing may change: As an emerging tool still in beta, pricing structure for Plus and Enterprise tiers is subject to change before general availability.
    • Compare total cost: Factor in potential time savings vs. subscription costs of established alternatives like Calendly ($10-$16/user/month).

    Note: Prices may be outdated or inaccurate.

    Nonprofit Discount & Special Offers

    Current Status: Ting does not currently offer nonprofit-specific discounts or special programs. However, the free tier provides substantial value at no cost, which may be sufficient for many nonprofit use cases.

    As the product matures and paid tiers launch, it's possible the company may introduce nonprofit pricing. Given that they're UK-based and backed by investors familiar with the social sector, they may be receptive to nonprofit partnerships.

    Recommendation: If you're interested in Enterprise features when they become available, contact the Ting team directly to discuss potential nonprofit pricing. Early adopters may have opportunities to influence pricing structure as the product develops.

    Support & Community Resources

    As an emerging tool, Ting's support ecosystem is still developing. Here's an honest assessment of what help you can expect if you encounter issues:

    Official Support Channels

    • Email Support

      [email protected] or [email protected]

      Response time: Not guaranteed; no published SLA

    • No Phone or Chat Support

      Email-only support currently available

    • No Dedicated Nonprofit Support

      No specialized team familiar with nonprofit use cases

    Documentation Quality

    ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5)

    • Help Center & FAQs

      Covers basic setup and common questions adequately

      Comprehensive FAQ section with 17+ topics

    • Onboarding Tutorials

      5-step setup process with clear guidance

      Users report onboarding takes "less than 2 minutes"

    • Limited Advanced Topics

      Documentation focuses on basic use; complex troubleshooting guidance limited

    • No Nonprofit-Specific Guides

      No documentation tailored to nonprofit use cases or workflows

    Community Resources

    • Very Limited User Community

      Product Hunt page with early discussions, but no dedicated forum or Slack workspace

    • Minimal Nonprofit Representation

      No visible nonprofit user community to learn from or connect with

    • No Consultant Ecosystem

      No third-party consultants or implementation partners available

    What This Means for Nonprofits

    You'll need to be comfortable with:

    • Self-service troubleshooting: Figuring things out through trial and error when documentation doesn't cover your scenario
    • Slower support responses: Email-only support without guaranteed response times (vs. chat or phone support from enterprise tools)
    • Limited peer learning: Small community means fewer examples, best practices, and workarounds to reference
    • No external experts: Can't hire consultants for implementation help if you get stuck

    Positive Note: Early users report the small team is responsive and genuinely helpful, even if slower than established tools with large support teams. As a newer company, they may also be more receptive to feature requests and feedback.

    Learning Curve

    Learning Curve: Easy to Moderate

    Ting's email-native approach makes it more intuitive than traditional scheduling tools for most users. However, the beta status and occasional unpredictability require some tolerance for experimentation.

    Realistic Time Investment

    • Initial Setup: 5-10 minutes

      Connect Google Calendar, review preferences, send first test email

      Users consistently report "less than 2 minutes" for basic setup

    • First Successful Use: Same day

      Simply CC Ting on your next scheduling email and observe how it works

    • Proficiency: 1-2 weeks

      Learn when to CC Ting, how to phrase requests effectively, and how to verify bookings

    • Mastery: 1 month

      Ting learns your patterns; you understand its capabilities and limitations

    Challenges Specific to Beta-Stage Tools

    • Occasional unpredictability: AI may misinterpret complex threads or unusual scheduling requests—requires verification
    • Limited troubleshooting guidance: When something doesn't work as expected, documentation may not cover your specific scenario
    • Product changes frequently: Features and behavior may evolve during beta, requiring occasional adaptation

    Who Will Struggle

    • Teams wanting guaranteed reliability without verification steps
    • Organizations uncomfortable with beta-level tools
    • Users needing extensive hand-holding or training resources
    • Staff resistant to AI-assisted tools

    Who Will Succeed

    • Tech-comfortable users who enjoy exploring new tools
    • Teams comfortable with experimentation and iteration
    • Users willing to verify AI-generated bookings
    • Organizations valuing natural email coordination over perfect reliability

    Integration & Compatibility

    Current Integration Status

    As of January 2026

    ✅ Fully Supported:

    • Google Calendar: Complete integration with real-time availability checking
    • Gmail: Native email-based operation
    • Google Meet: Automatic video conferencing link creation
    • Zoom: Video conferencing integration available
    • WhatsApp & SMS: Alternative scheduling channels (via Twilio)

    ⏳ Coming Soon:

    • Outlook Calendar: Microsoft 365 support in development (timeline not specified)
    • Microsoft Teams: Listed as coming integration

    What's Missing (Compared to Established Tools)

    • No CRM integrations: Unlike Calendly or similar tools, no native connections to Salesforce, HubSpot, or nonprofit CRMs like Bloomerang or DonorPerfect
    • No Zapier/Make support: Cannot automate workflows with other tools (e.g., creating contacts in your CRM when meetings are scheduled)
    • Limited calendar platforms: Only Google Calendar currently supported (critical limitation for Microsoft 365 organizations)
    • No payment processing: Cannot collect fees for consultations or events (unlike Calendly)

    Workaround Options

    If your must-have integration isn't available:

    • API Integration (Technical)

      Ting offers a RESTful API (documented but basic). Requires developer or technical staff to build custom connections.

    • Manual Data Entry

      Manually add meeting details to your CRM or other systems after Ting books meetings—less efficient but functional.

    • Parallel Tools

      Use Ting for external coordination, maintain Calendly/Acuity for internal scheduling or situations requiring integrations.

    Integration Maturity Warning

    Ting's integration ecosystem is significantly less mature than established scheduling tools:

    • Calendly offers 50+ integrations vs. Ting's ~5 platform connections
    • Acuity/Squarespace Scheduling connects to major CRMs—Ting does not
    • If you rely heavily on automation workflows, Ting is not yet ready for your organization

    Choose Ting if email-native scheduling is your priority and you can work with limited integrations. Choose established alternatives if you need extensive platform connections.

    Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • Email-native coordination: Eliminates scheduling links and maintains personal feel—especially valuable for donor relations and fundraising
    • Zero friction for participants: Meeting invitees need no tools, accounts, or clicks—just reply naturally to emails
    • Context-aware AI: Understands conversation nuance and learns preferences over time via "Ting Memories"
    • Currently free: Core scheduling functionality at no cost—significant value for budget-conscious nonprofits
    • Quick setup: Users consistently report onboarding takes "less than 2 minutes"
    • Responsive team: As a smaller company, may be more receptive to feedback and feature requests
    • Multi-channel support: Works via email, WhatsApp, and SMS with multi-language capabilities

    Cons

    • Beta-level reliability: Company acknowledges "errors may occur" and users must "always check availability"
    • Limited calendar support: Google only; Outlook support "coming soon" but no timeline (critical blocker for Microsoft 365 orgs)
    • Minimal integration ecosystem: No CRM connections, no Zapier/Make, no automation workflows
    • Small user community: Limited peer learning, few shared best practices, no consultant ecosystem
    • Email-only support: No phone or chat support; no guaranteed response times or SLAs
    • Privacy considerations: AI processes email content through Google's Gemini LLM (with associated data sharing)
    • Pricing uncertainty: Paid tiers planned but pricing not yet announced; free tier features may migrate to paid plans
    • Occasional delivery issues: Corporate spam filters may block Ting's coordination emails

    Critical Questions to Ask Yourself

    • Are we comfortable with occasional AI errors in exchange for more natural scheduling?
    • Do we have technical capacity to troubleshoot when support is slower than established tools?
    • Can we afford to migrate to another tool if Ting doesn't work out (e.g., pricing changes, features don't evolve as needed)?
    • Is eliminating scheduling links worth trying a beta-stage tool vs. choosing a proven alternative?
    • Are we using Google Workspace (or willing to wait indefinitely for Outlook support)?

    Established Alternatives to Consider

    Before committing to Ting, consider these proven alternatives that offer greater maturity, reliability, and support:

    Calendly: Industry Standard Link-Based Scheduling

    Most popular scheduling tool for professionals and small businesses

    Advantages:

    • Proven reliability with millions of users and extensive track record
    • 50+ integrations including CRMs, Zoom, Slack, Zapier, and payment processing
    • Comprehensive documentation, active community, extensive third-party consultants
    • Team features, round-robin scheduling, collective scheduling for multiple participants
    • Supports both Google Calendar and Outlook/Microsoft 365

    What You Give Up:

    • Requires sending scheduling links (less personal than Ting's email-native approach)
    • Recipients must click link and navigate external page to book times
    • No AI-powered context understanding or preference learning

    Best For:

    Nonprofits wanting reliable, established scheduling with extensive integrations and support

    Pricing:

    Free tier available; paid plans start at $12/user/month

    Reclaim.ai: AI-Powered Calendar Management

    Automated time blocking and scheduling optimization

    Advantages:

    • AI-powered time blocking: automatically schedules tasks, habits, and focus time
    • Protects time for deep work while still allowing meeting scheduling
    • Unlimited calendar syncs (vs. Calendly's 6-calendar limit)
    • Task integration with project management tools (Asana, Linear, Jira)
    • Supports both Google Calendar and Outlook/Microsoft 365

    What You Give Up:

    • Still uses scheduling links (not email-native like Ting)
    • More complex tool with steeper learning curve than simple scheduling tools
    • Focuses on personal productivity optimization, less on external coordination

    Best For:

    Nonprofits wanting AI-powered calendar optimization beyond just scheduling meetings

    Pricing:

    Free tier available; paid plans start at $10/user/month

    Microsoft Bookings: Native Microsoft 365 Solution

    Built-in scheduling for Microsoft 365 organizations

    Advantages:

    • Included with Microsoft 365 Business subscriptions (no additional cost)
    • Native Outlook and Teams integration—seamless for Microsoft-centric nonprofits
    • Team scheduling, staff management, and resource booking
    • Microsoft's enterprise-level support and reliability

    What You Give Up:

    • Requires Microsoft 365 Business or higher subscription
    • Less elegant interface than specialized scheduling tools
    • Limited third-party integrations compared to Calendly

    Best For:

    Nonprofits already using Microsoft 365 Business who want included scheduling without additional costs

    Pricing:

    Included with Microsoft 365 Business subscriptions

    The Decision Framework

    Choose Ting if:

    • Email-native coordination (no scheduling links) is critical for your relationship-building work
    • You use Google Workspace and can tolerate beta-level reliability
    • You have technical capacity to troubleshoot and verify AI bookings
    • You can work with limited integrations (no CRM connections, no automation)
    • You want to try innovative approaches and influence product direction as an early adopter

    Choose Established Alternatives if:

    • You need proven reliability for mission-critical scheduling
    • You use Microsoft 365 (Outlook support not yet available in Ting)
    • You require extensive integrations (CRM, Zapier, payment processing)
    • You need comprehensive support, documentation, and consultant ecosystem
    • You prefer established tools over experimenting with emerging solutions

    How to Evaluate This Tool Before Committing

    Don't just trust our guide—test Ting yourself with this structured evaluation approach designed for nonprofit decision-makers:

    Phase 1: Initial Research (2-3 hours)

    Week 1: Desk research before signing up

    • Read this guide thoroughly, including all warnings and limitations
    • Review Ting's official website, FAQ, and privacy policy
    • Read user reviews on Product Hunt and Trustpilot
    • Check if your organization uses Google Workspace (Outlook not supported yet)
    • Review your must-have integrations—can you work without CRM connections?

    Red flags at this stage:

    • • You use Microsoft 365 (deal-breaker until Outlook support launches)
    • • You require CRM automation or Zapier workflows (not yet available)
    • • Your organization has low tolerance for beta-level tools

    Phase 2: Hands-On Testing (1-2 weeks)

    Week 2-3: Limited trial with test scenarios

    • Sign up for free account (no credit card required)
    • Connect your Google Calendar and complete onboarding
    • Test scheduling with internal colleagues first (low-risk practice)
    • Try 3-5 real external scheduling scenarios (donors, partners, volunteers)
    • Test rescheduling and cancellation handling
    • Reach out to support with a test question (gauge responsiveness)
    • Verify all bookings on your actual calendar—don't trust AI blindly

    Keep a Testing Journal:

    • • What worked smoothly? What felt confusing?
    • • Did Ting correctly interpret your scheduling requests?
    • • How did external contacts respond to the AI coordination?
    • • Were there any errors or misunderstandings?
    • • How does this compare to your current scheduling method?

    Phase 3: Team Validation (1 week)

    Week 4: Get additional perspectives

    • Have 2-3 team members test independently with their own scheduling needs
    • Gather feedback on usability, reliability, and fit with your workflows
    • Assess whether time savings actually materialize or if verification overhead offsets gains
    • Check with IT/admin about data privacy and security concerns

    Questions to Answer:

    • • Would this actually solve our scheduling pain better than current tools?
    • • Is our team willing to verify AI bookings consistently?
    • • Do we have capacity to troubleshoot when things don't work?
    • • What's our backup plan if pricing changes or features don't evolve?

    Phase 4: Decision Framework

    Go/No-Go criteria based on your testing

    ✅ Proceed to Pilot if:

    • Tool clearly coordinates scheduling better than your current method
    • Team finds it usable and is willing to verify bookings
    • AI accuracy was acceptable (over 80-90% correct interpretation)
    • Support was responsive when you reached out
    • Free tier meets your needs (or you're comfortable with future paid pricing)
    • You can work without the missing integrations

    ❌ Don't Proceed if:

    • Core functionality was buggy, unreliable, or error-prone in testing
    • Team strongly resists ("This is too complicated" or "I don't trust AI")
    • You encountered multiple scheduling errors or misinterpretations
    • Support was unresponsive or unhelpful when you had questions
    • Verification overhead felt too burdensome vs. time savings
    • Too many compromises vs. using Calendly or another established alternative

    Bottom Line on Evaluation

    Emerging tools require more thorough vetting than established ones. Invest 3-4 weeks in structured evaluation before committing to Ting for critical scheduling needs. The extra diligence upfront prevents expensive mistakes (wasted time, missed meetings, frustrated contacts) later.

    The good news: Since Ting is currently free and requires no credit card, the cost of testing is just your time. Use that opportunity to genuinely evaluate whether it solves your problem better than alternatives.

    Getting Started (The Cautious Approach)

    If you've completed the evaluation above and decided to pilot Ting, here's a staged approach that minimizes risk:

    Step 1 (Week 1): Sign Up & Initial Testing

    • Don't: Connect your entire organization or use for critical donor meetings immediately
    • Do: Sign up at meet-ting.com, connect your Google Calendar, test with internal colleagues
    • Goal: Validate that setup works and Ting can successfully coordinate simple meetings

    Step 2 (Week 2): Test Your Critical Use Case

    • Don't: Build complex multi-stakeholder coordination immediately
    • Do: Focus on your #1 scheduling pain point (e.g., donor meetings, volunteer coordination)
    • Goal: Confirm Ting actually solves your specific scheduling problem

    Step 3 (Week 3): Evaluate Reliability & Support

    • Don't: Assume everything will work perfectly without verification
    • Do: Ask a question to support, test edge cases, verify all bookings on your calendar
    • Goal: Assess quality of help you'll get when stuck and identify limitations

    Step 4 (Week 4): Decision Point

    If Successful:

    • Continue using free tier for limited pilot (1-3 staff members)
    • Maintain parallel use of old scheduling tool as safety net
    • Document actual time savings and issues encountered

    If Mixed Results:

    • Continue testing for another 1-2 weeks with different scenarios
    • Contact support with specific questions or issues
    • Re-evaluate against established alternatives

    If Unsuccessful:

    • Disconnect account, thank them for the trial opportunity
    • Choose an established alternative (Calendly, Reclaim, Microsoft Bookings)
    • Consider revisiting Ting in 6-12 months when it's more mature

    Step 5 (Months 2-3): Gradual Expansion (If Pilot Succeeds)

    • Only if Month 1 pilot succeeds: Add 2-3 more team members or use cases slowly
    • Continue monitoring: Track actual benefits, errors, and user satisfaction
    • Maintain fallback: Keep old scheduling tool active until fully confident in Ting

    Step 6 (Month 3): Commit or Abandon Decision

    After 3 months of real-world use, make a final decision:

    If It's Working:

    • Consider expanding to more staff members
    • Monitor for paid tier announcements (may offer additional features)
    • Share feedback with Ting team to influence product direction

    If It's Not Working:

    • Disconnect account and migrate to proven alternative
    • Document lessons learned for future tool evaluations
    • You've minimized risk through staged approach—no significant loss

    Key Principle for Emerging Tools

    Move slowly and validate at each step. With emerging tools like Ting, the beta status and limited track record mean you need more caution than you would with Calendly or similar established alternatives. The staged approach above protects your organization from committing too quickly to a tool that may not meet your needs.

    Need Help with Implementation?

    Evaluating and implementing new scheduling tools—especially emerging ones—can be time-consuming and complex. If you want expert guidance on whether Ting is right for your nonprofit or help implementing it effectively, we offer consulting support.

    How We Can Help

    • Tool Selection Guidance: Compare Ting vs. established alternatives (Calendly, Reclaim, Microsoft Bookings) for your specific use cases
    • Implementation Support: Help with setup, testing, and integration with your existing workflows
    • Staff Training: Teach your team how to use Ting effectively and verify AI bookings
    • Process Design: Develop scheduling workflows that maximize efficiency while minimizing risk
    • Troubleshooting: Ongoing support when you encounter issues or need optimization help
    Schedule a ConsultationLearn About Our Services

    Resources

    Official Ting Resources

    User Reviews & Community

    Alternatives for Comparison

    Related One Hundred Nights Articles

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Is Ting reliable enough for nonprofit use?

    Ting is explicitly in beta with the company acknowledging that "errors may occur" and users should "always check your availability." The company claims over 90% reliability, but this is an emerging tool still under active development. It's best suited for nonprofits with technical capacity to troubleshoot issues and verify bookings, not for mission-critical scheduling where errors could have serious consequences.

    How does Ting compare to Calendly?

    Ting takes a fundamentally different approach than Calendly:

    • Calendly: Uses scheduling links that recipients click to book times. More mature with extensive features and integrations.
    • Ting: Operates entirely within email threads using AI. More natural experience but beta-level reliability and limited integrations.

    Choose Ting if you want to eliminate scheduling links and your contacts prefer email-based coordination. Choose Calendly if you need proven reliability, extensive integrations, and comprehensive support.

    What kind of technical support can we expect?

    Ting offers email support ([email protected]) with no published SLA or response time guarantees. As a small, emerging company with a limited team, support responses may be slower than enterprise tools. The documentation includes FAQs and onboarding guides, but advanced troubleshooting resources are limited. Early users report the team is responsive and helpful, but you should expect to solve some issues through experimentation rather than immediate support assistance.

    Can we trust Ting with sensitive donor or board scheduling?

    Ting processes email content through Google's Gemini LLM on the free tier, with data shared with multiple third-party processors. While the company claims GDPR compliance and says they don't train on user data, the privacy policy mentions potential future "time-based advertising" (opt-in claimed).

    For highly sensitive scheduling (board executive sessions, confidential donor conversations, legal matters), we recommend using more established tools with clearer privacy guarantees until Ting matures and offers enterprise-level data protection. For general staff scheduling and routine coordination, the current privacy approach is likely acceptable for most nonprofits.

    Does Ting work with Outlook and Microsoft 365?

    No, not currently. Outlook Calendar support is listed as "coming soon" but not available yet. Ting currently only supports Google Calendar and Gmail fully. If your nonprofit uses Microsoft 365 as your primary email and calendar platform, Ting is not yet suitable for your organization. Monitor their roadmap for Outlook support updates before considering adoption.

    Is Ting really free, or will pricing change?

    Ting currently offers a free tier with core scheduling functionality at no cost. However, they plan to introduce paid "Plus" and "Enterprise" tiers with additional features like custom AI tone, branded signatures, and multiple inbox support. As an emerging company still in beta, pricing structure may change as the product matures. The free tier is likely to remain available for basic use, but expect some features to move to paid plans in the future.

    What happens if Ting doesn't work out for us?

    Since Ting operates through email and Google Calendar, there's no significant data lock-in. You can simply stop CCing Ting on emails and disconnect the calendar integration. Your calendar data remains in Google Calendar, and you can switch to another scheduling tool (Calendly, Reclaim, etc.) without major migration effort. This low-risk exit strategy makes Ting safer to pilot than tools with proprietary data structures.