The AI Alliance: How Meta, IBM, and 180+ Organizations Are Shaping Open AI
A global coalition of more than 180 organizations, universities, and research institutions is quietly reshaping the future of artificial intelligence. The AI Alliance, co-led by Meta and IBM, has grown from 57 founding members in 2023 to a nonprofit-structured global community advocating for open, trustworthy AI. Here is what nonprofit leaders need to understand about this effort and why it matters for the tools your organization uses.
When most nonprofit leaders think about the forces shaping AI, they think about ChatGPT, Google Gemini, or Microsoft Copilot. But a less visible yet equally consequential effort has been building since late 2023: the AI Alliance, a global consortium whose membership includes tech giants, universities, government research labs, and nonprofits working together to ensure that AI remains open, safe, and beneficial for all of society. Understanding what this alliance does and why it was formed helps nonprofit leaders make more informed decisions about the tools they adopt, the policies they build, and the future they are helping to shape.
The AI landscape in 2026 is defined by a fundamental tension. On one side are closed proprietary systems from companies like OpenAI, Microsoft, and Google, where the underlying models, training data, and decision-making processes are not publicly available. On the other side is an open-source tradition, championed by the AI Alliance, that argues AI should be developed transparently, with code and models that anyone can inspect, modify, and build upon. This is not just a technical debate; it is a governance question with profound implications for nonprofits, particularly those serving vulnerable communities where AI decisions can have significant consequences.
For nonprofit organizations, the open vs. closed AI debate has practical ramifications. Open-source AI models can be run locally, protecting sensitive client data without routing it through commercial servers. They can be customized for specific community needs. They are often dramatically cheaper to use, freeing up budget for mission work. And they can be audited for bias, a critical consideration when your programs serve people who have historically been harmed by opaque algorithmic systems. The AI Alliance's advocacy and infrastructure development directly affects how accessible, trustworthy, and affordable these open alternatives remain.
This article explains what the AI Alliance is, how it evolved from a tech consortium into a formal nonprofit structure, what projects it is leading, and what the open AI movement means for your organization's AI strategy. It also addresses some of the honest complexities and criticisms of the alliance, so you can engage with this topic with full information.
What Is the AI Alliance?
The AI Alliance launched in December 2023 with 57 founding members and a mission to foster an open community where developers and researchers could accelerate responsible AI innovation while maintaining scientific rigor, trust, safety, security, diversity, and economic competitiveness. The founding coalition was notable for who was in it and, just as notably, who was not. Members included AMD, Intel, Oracle, Sony, Cerebras, Stability AI, Hugging Face, and the Linux Foundation, along with major universities in Asia, Europe, and North America, and public research institutions like CERN and NASA.
Conspicuously absent were OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, and Amazon Web Services. This absence was not accidental. Those companies are the primary developers of the large proprietary AI models that define much of today's AI landscape, and the AI Alliance was founded explicitly as a counterweight to that closed-ecosystem approach. The alliance's co-founders, Meta and IBM, have both made significant investments in open-source AI: Meta through its Llama family of open models, and IBM through its Granite models and the InstructLab training framework.
By mid-2025, the alliance had grown to more than 180 member organizations across every major global region, and it had taken a significant organizational step: incorporation as two closely linked nonprofit entities. A 501(c)(3) research and education lab was established to conduct open AI research and provide educational resources, while a 501(c)(6) technology and advocacy association was created to represent the open AI community in policy discussions, standards bodies, and industry forums. This structural transformation signaled that the AI Alliance was moving beyond a loose consortium and committing to the sustained, institutional work required to genuinely influence how AI develops globally.
180+ Members
Global coalition
Organizations spanning industry, government, universities, and nonprofits across every major global region, united around open AI development.
Nonprofit Structure
Incorporated in 2025
Two nonprofit entities: a 501(c)(3) research and education lab, and a 501(c)(6) technology and advocacy association, formalized in June 2025.
Open Innovation Mission
For all of society
The alliance's stated mission is to make AI open, trusted, safe, and useful for all of society, with an emphasis on open research and community access.
Why Open-Source AI Matters for Nonprofits
To understand the AI Alliance's significance, it helps to understand what open-source AI actually enables in practice. When an AI model is open-source, its underlying code and model weights are publicly available. Anyone can download it, run it locally, inspect how it works, modify it for their specific needs, and build applications on top of it. This is in contrast to closed proprietary models, where users interact with the AI through an API or interface but have no visibility into or control over the underlying system.
For nonprofits, open-source AI offers several concrete advantages that align with both mission and budget realities. Cost is perhaps the most immediate consideration. Open-weight models from Meta's Llama family, for instance, can be run on modest hardware or accessed through low-cost providers at a small fraction of what commercial API access to GPT-4 or similar models costs. Research suggests that open models cost dramatically less per token than closed alternatives, and those cost differences can compound significantly when processing large volumes of documents, case notes, or grant reports. For resource-constrained organizations, this is not a minor detail; it is the difference between being able to afford AI assistance and not.
Privacy and data security represent the second major advantage. Many nonprofits work with highly sensitive information, including mental health records, immigration status, domestic violence histories, financial hardship details, and child welfare data. Sending that information to commercial AI providers raises legitimate questions about where data is stored, how it is used in training future models, and who has access to it. With locally deployed open-source models, sensitive data never leaves your organization's own infrastructure. This approach aligns directly with the privacy obligations that many nonprofits carry under HIPAA, FERPA, state privacy laws, and their own ethical commitments to the communities they serve.
The third advantage is customization. Open models can be fine-tuned on your organization's own documents, case notes, or terminology, making them more useful for specialized tasks. A social services organization might train a local model to understand the specific assessment tools it uses. A legal aid organization might customize an AI assistant to know relevant state statutes. A workforce development nonprofit might fine-tune a model to understand the specific industries and job categories it tracks. This level of customization is generally not available or affordable with commercial proprietary models. Importantly, open-source AI also allows for external auditing of how models make decisions, which is particularly valuable for organizations that need to ensure AI governance and accountability in their programs.
Advantages of Open AI for Nonprofits
- Dramatically lower cost per query compared to commercial APIs
- Sensitive data stays within your organization's own infrastructure
- Models can be customized for sector-specific needs and terminology
- Decision-making processes can be inspected and audited for bias
- No vendor lock-in or dependency on a single commercial provider's terms
- Operational continuity even if a vendor changes pricing or exits the market
Challenges to Consider
- Requires more technical capacity to set up and maintain than plug-and-play tools
- Local deployment needs computing hardware, which has upfront costs
- Open models may lag slightly behind frontier proprietary models on specialized tasks
- Less polished user interfaces compared to consumer-facing commercial products
- Community support rather than dedicated vendor customer service
- Fine-tuning for specialized use cases requires data science expertise
Key Projects the AI Alliance Is Leading
The AI Alliance is not simply a lobbying organization or a forum for making declarations. It runs concrete technical projects and collaborative initiatives that produce tangible resources for the broader AI community. Understanding these projects helps nonprofit leaders assess how the alliance contributes to the open AI ecosystem and where future resources and standards might emerge.
Trust and Safety Evaluation Initiative (TSEI)
Developing standardized safety benchmarks for AI models
One of the AI Alliance's highest-priority initiatives, the TSEI aims to create rigorous, standardized benchmarks and evaluation frameworks for assessing AI safety. A persistent challenge in the AI industry is that different organizations measure safety in different ways, making it nearly impossible to compare models or hold them to consistent standards. By developing shared evaluation criteria, the TSEI creates tools that any organization, including nonprofits evaluating tools for their programs, can use to assess whether an AI system meets safety and reliability thresholds.
For nonprofits building AI governance frameworks, the emergence of standardized safety benchmarks is important context. Rather than having to invent your own evaluation criteria from scratch, organizations will increasingly be able to reference established standards developed through collaborative, multi-stakeholder processes like the TSEI.
Open Trusted Data Initiative (OTDI)
Building a commons of high-quality, legally clear training data
One of the fundamental challenges in AI development is data: training effective AI models requires enormous quantities of high-quality text, and questions about the copyright status, bias, and quality of that training data affect how AI systems behave. The OTDI works to create a curated repository of open, trusted datasets that model developers can use with confidence that the data is legally clear and meets quality standards.
This matters for nonprofits in multiple ways. Organizations that deal with historically underrepresented communities have long raised concerns that AI models trained on unrepresentative data perform poorly for those communities. By working to diversify the data that goes into open AI models, the OTDI helps address some of the foundational equity concerns that nonprofit leaders often have about AI systems. It also advances the cause of addressing AI bias in models serving marginalized communities.
National AI Research Resource (NAIRR) Deep Partnership
Democratizing access to computing infrastructure
One of the most significant barriers to open AI development is access to computing infrastructure. Training and running large AI models requires substantial processing power, typically in the form of specialized graphics processing units (GPUs) that are expensive to purchase and maintain. The AI Alliance joined the NAIRR Pilot Deep Partnership program to help break down these barriers, providing eligible researchers and organizations with access to GPU clusters, CPU resources, storage, and open-source AI models through cloud infrastructure provided by IBM and other partners.
For nonprofits with research components or those engaged in academic partnerships, this infrastructure access could enable AI projects that would otherwise be cost-prohibitive. Organizations developing custom AI solutions for specialized community needs, such as tools for legal aid, social work, or public health, stand to benefit from this kind of shared computing infrastructure.
Open Innovation Principles and Policy Advocacy
Shaping global AI governance standards
In April 2025, the AI Alliance released a set of 14 principles across six domains: Openness and Access, Selection and Choice, Safety and Security, Privacy and Transparency, Economy and Development, and Societal Impact and Diverse Viewpoints. These principles are designed to guide AI development and governance at industry and policy levels, and the AI Alliance's 501(c)(6) advocacy organization actively promotes them in legislative and regulatory discussions in the United States and internationally.
This policy work directly affects the regulatory environment in which all AI tools, including those used by nonprofits, operate. Organizations concerned about how AI regulations might evolve, whether regarding data privacy, algorithmic accountability, or sector-specific requirements like those affecting healthcare or education nonprofits, should follow the AI Alliance's advocacy work as one of several inputs to their own AI compliance planning.
Who Is in the AI Alliance
The AI Alliance's membership spans a remarkably diverse set of institutions, which is both one of its greatest strengths and one of the sources of complexity in evaluating its claims. Understanding who sits at the table helps nonprofit leaders assess whose interests are represented and where potential tensions might exist.
On the industry side, founding members include AMD, Intel, Dell Technologies, Oracle, and Sony, alongside AI-specific companies like Stability AI and Cerebras. These companies have strong business interests in open AI because proprietary models from OpenAI and Google create competitive ecosystems that disadvantage hardware and software companies whose products might be more relevant in an open ecosystem. That does not make their advocacy disingenuous, but it does mean their support for openness is partly strategic as well as principled.
The academic and research institutions in the alliance include Carnegie Mellon University, the University of Illinois, Yale University, Vanderbilt University, Georgia Tech, and international universities across Europe and Asia. CERN and NASA bring government research credibility to the consortium. These institutions represent the open-science tradition, which has a long history of prioritizing knowledge sharing over proprietary control, and their presence gives the alliance significant credibility when arguing that open AI development is consistent with rigorous scientific values.
Notable nonprofit and foundation-adjacent members include Hugging Face, which operates as a kind of open-source AI commons and is one of the most important resources for anyone working with open models, and the Linux Foundation, which has decades of experience managing open-source software ecosystems. These organizations bring technical infrastructure and community governance expertise that are essential to making open AI work in practice, not just in principle.
Industry Leaders
Technology companies driving open development
- Meta (co-founder, Llama open model family)
- IBM (co-founder, Granite models and InstructLab)
- AMD, Intel, Oracle, Dell, and Sony
- Stability AI, Cerebras, and other AI-focused companies
Research and Nonprofit Members
Academic and public interest institutions
- Carnegie Mellon, Yale, Georgia Tech, and UIUC
- CERN (European nuclear research) and NASA
- Hugging Face (open-source AI model commons)
- Linux Foundation (open-source ecosystem governance)
The Open vs. Closed AI Debate: What Nonprofits Should Know
The AI Alliance's existence is, in part, a response to the dominance of closed proprietary models in the AI market. But the debate between open and closed AI is not as simple as "open is good, closed is bad." Both approaches have genuine merits and risks, and nonprofits need to understand the nuances before drawing firm conclusions about which tools to use or which policy positions to support.
Proponents of open AI, including the AI Alliance, argue that openness enables broader participation in AI development, reduces concentration of power in a small number of commercial entities, allows for external auditing and accountability, and makes AI more accessible to under-resourced organizations and communities. They point to the Linux operating system as evidence that open-source approaches can produce robust, widely deployed, and economically successful technology. Meta's Llama models, which have been downloaded more than a billion times, suggest that open AI can achieve significant scale and capability.
Critics of open AI, including some of the most prominent AI safety researchers, raise concerns that making powerful AI models publicly available could enable misuse by bad actors. If a model capable of writing convincing phishing emails or synthesizing dangerous information is freely available and can be run without any platform's content filters, the potential for harm is real. Defenders of open AI counter that proprietary models are not meaningfully safer, as they can be jailbroken or accessed by bad actors through legitimate means, and that the benefits of openness outweigh the incremental safety risks.
For nonprofit leaders, the honest answer is that both perspectives contain important truths. The AI Alliance's focus on safety evaluation and standards development reflects a recognition that openness alone is not sufficient; responsible open AI requires investment in safety research and governance frameworks. Nonprofits building their own AI governance policies should consider this complexity rather than treating open-source AI as inherently safer or more trustworthy than commercial alternatives. The key question is whether a given tool, open or closed, has been subject to appropriate evaluation, is being used for appropriate purposes, and has adequate governance in place.
What the AI Alliance Means for Your Nonprofit
Understanding the AI Alliance's work and the broader open AI ecosystem helps nonprofit leaders make better decisions in several practical areas. The most immediate implication is awareness that you have more choices than you might realize. The commercial AI tools marketed most aggressively are not the only options, and in some cases, open-source alternatives may serve your needs better.
Tools like Ollama, LM Studio, and GPT4All, which the AI Alliance ecosystem helps support, allow nonprofits to run capable AI models entirely on their own computers or servers, with no data leaving the organization. For organizations handling sensitive case information, this local deployment approach may be not just a cost saving but an ethical requirement. The AI Alliance's infrastructure work, including the NAIRR partnership, is aimed at making such deployments more accessible even for organizations without deep technical staff.
The AI Alliance's policy advocacy also affects the regulatory environment in which your organization will operate. As AI regulations develop at federal and state levels, the standards and principles championed by the AI Alliance will be one of the major inputs shaping what compliance looks like. Nonprofits that want to engage in AI policy and regulation discussions relevant to their sector have an opportunity to follow the AI Alliance's work and consider whether and how to engage with it.
Finally, the AI Alliance's emphasis on safety evaluation and standardized benchmarks will, over time, make it easier for nonprofits to assess the tools they adopt. As the TSEI develops broadly accepted safety standards, organizations will have better reference points when evaluating whether a proposed AI tool is appropriate for use in programs serving vulnerable populations. This is particularly relevant for nonprofits subject to sector-specific regulations, such as those working in healthcare, child welfare, or housing.
Practical Steps for Nonprofits
Actions to take based on the AI Alliance's work
- Explore Hugging Face as a resource for finding open AI models relevant to your work
- Consider local deployment tools for applications that handle sensitive client data
- Monitor the AI Alliance's safety evaluation work as you develop your own AI vetting processes
- Follow emerging AI standards and policy discussions that will shape compliance requirements
- Ask vendors about their AI model sourcing and whether they use open or proprietary underlying models
Open AI Resources Available Today
Tools supported by the open AI ecosystem
- Meta's Llama models, downloaded over 1 billion times, available through Hugging Face
- IBM's Granite models, optimized for business applications and deployed by Deloitte for nonprofits
- InstructLab, a framework for fine-tuning open models on your organization's own data
- Ollama and LM Studio for running open models locally without specialized infrastructure
- DeepSeek and Mistral open models that offer strong performance at minimal cost
Honest Limitations and Criticisms
The AI Alliance's ambitions are significant, but a candid assessment requires acknowledging the limitations and criticisms the consortium faces. First, while the alliance has published principles and launched initiatives, its ability to shape the actual behavior of AI systems at scale remains unproven. The companies developing the most capable and widely used proprietary models, OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft, are not members, which limits the alliance's direct influence on the most consequential AI development happening today.
There is also a reasonable question about whether some of the alliance's corporate members are genuinely committed to open innovation or are primarily interested in the competitive benefits that open AI provides relative to the proprietary ecosystem of their main competitors. Meta's openness with Llama, for instance, is not purely altruistic; it allows Meta to benefit from a much larger community of developers building on and improving the Llama ecosystem, which ultimately supports Meta's AI product ambitions. This does not make the alliance's work less valuable, but nonprofit leaders engaging with the open AI ecosystem should maintain a clear-eyed view of the incentive structures involved.
The alliance's safety work has also faced scrutiny from researchers who argue that releasing powerful models without adequate safety evaluation is itself a risk, regardless of the openness principles invoked to justify it. The TSEI and related safety initiatives are genuine responses to this concern, but they are works in progress rather than established solutions. Nonprofits should not assume that "open" automatically means "safe" any more than they should assume that "commercial" automatically means "safe." Independent evaluation of specific tools for specific use cases remains necessary regardless of how those tools are distributed.
Finally, the alliance's nonprofit structure, while a significant step toward institutional permanence, is new. It remains to be seen whether the 501(c)(3) research arm and the 501(c)(6) advocacy organization will develop the funding base, technical staff, and governance processes necessary to become durable institutions. Nonprofits that have watched similar coalitions form and dissolve will rightly want to see evidence of sustained investment before treating the AI Alliance's work as a stable pillar of the AI governance landscape.
Implications for Nonprofit AI Policy and Advocacy
Nonprofits are not just consumers of AI; they are increasingly voices in the policy debates that shape how AI develops and who it serves. The AI Alliance's work creates both opportunities and frameworks for nonprofit organizations to engage with these debates more effectively.
The alliance's 14 open innovation principles offer a useful framework for evaluating AI tools and policies from a public-interest perspective. The principles around "Societal Impact and Diverse Viewpoints" and "Privacy and Transparency" align closely with values that most mission-driven organizations already hold. When evaluating AI tools, nonprofits can use these principles as one lens among several to assess whether a system reflects values consistent with their missions. More broadly, the existence of these principles, developed through a multi-stakeholder process, gives nonprofit advocates a reference point when engaging with technology vendors, funders, or policymakers about what responsible AI looks like.
For nonprofits engaged in direct policy advocacy, particularly those working on technology access, digital equity, or data privacy, the AI Alliance's advocacy arm is working on issues that directly intersect with social sector concerns. Organizations that want to engage in AI policy discussions have opportunities to follow the alliance's work, understand its positions, and consider whether their own policy advocacy aligns with or diverges from the open AI framework. The alliance's submission to the National AI Action Plan, for instance, called for expanding open-source offerings as a way to democratize AI access, a position that aligns with many equity-focused nonprofits' goals.
Building a thoughtful AI strategy means understanding both the landscape of available tools and the forces shaping that landscape. The AI Alliance is one of those forces, and its trajectory over the next few years will affect the options available to nonprofits, the regulatory environment they operate in, and the broader norms around what responsible AI development looks like. Staying informed about the alliance's work is not just an academic exercise; it is part of the practical work of building AI literacy and capability in your organization.
Conclusion
The AI Alliance represents a significant and growing counterforce to the closed, proprietary AI ecosystem that currently dominates the industry. Led by Meta and IBM and now including more than 180 organizations, it has formalized into a nonprofit structure and launched substantive projects around safety evaluation, trusted data, and computing access. Its work matters for nonprofits not because it requires direct engagement but because it shapes the landscape of tools, standards, and regulations that all organizations navigating AI adoption will encounter.
For practical purposes, the most immediately relevant implication is that high-quality open-source AI tools exist and are improving rapidly. Nonprofits that assume their only options are subscriptions to commercial products from the dominant providers are working with an outdated map. Open models from the Llama and Granite families, tools for local deployment, and platforms like Hugging Face all represent a viable alternative ecosystem with genuine advantages for organizations that handle sensitive data, have constrained budgets, or need to customize AI behavior for specialized community needs.
The honest caveats are also important: open-source AI requires more technical capacity to deploy than plug-and-play commercial tools, the safety guarantees of open models are still being developed rather than established, and the AI Alliance's ability to influence the overall direction of AI development is limited by the absence of the industry's most powerful players. Like most technology choices, the question of open vs. proprietary AI does not have a simple universal answer. It requires honest assessment of your organization's capacity, your data privacy obligations, your budget constraints, and the specific tasks you need AI to perform.
What the AI Alliance's growth does signal, definitively, is that the open AI movement is not marginal or temporary. With more than 180 member organizations, a formalized nonprofit structure, active projects, and growing political and policy engagement, it is a durable force in the AI landscape. Nonprofit leaders who understand this landscape will be better positioned to make strategic decisions about AI adoption and to engage thoughtfully with the broader policy conversations that will shape how AI serves, or fails to serve, the communities they work to support.
Ready to Build a More Strategic AI Approach?
Understanding the full AI landscape, including open-source alternatives and the governance forces shaping it, helps nonprofits make smarter decisions. We help organizations develop AI strategies grounded in their missions, values, and practical realities.