Community-Centered AI: How Nonprofits Can Co-Design AI Tools With Local Partners
The most effective AI tools for nonprofits aren't built in isolation—they're co-designed with the communities they serve. Learn how to partner with local organizations and community members to create AI solutions that truly meet local needs and respect cultural context.
Too often, AI tools are designed by technologists who don't fully understand the communities they're meant to serve. The result? Solutions that miss the mark, perpetuate bias, or fail to gain community trust. Community-centered AI design flips this script, putting community members and local partners at the center of the design process.
Co-designing AI tools with community partners ensures that technology serves real needs, respects cultural context, and builds trust rather than imposing external solutions. This approach is especially critical for nonprofits working with marginalized communities, where trust is hard-won and easily lost.
This guide explores how nonprofits can engage in community-centered AI design, from identifying the right partners to structuring collaborative design processes that produce tools that truly serve local communities. For related guidance on ensuring AI tools advance equity, see our article on using AI for social justice.
Why Community-Centered Design Matters
Traditional top-down technology design often fails in nonprofit contexts because it doesn't account for local knowledge, cultural nuances, and community priorities. Community-centered design addresses these gaps.
Addresses Real Needs
Community members know their own challenges best. Co-design ensures AI tools solve actual problems rather than perceived ones, leading to higher adoption and better outcomes.
Respects Cultural Context
AI tools must work within existing cultural practices and communication styles. Community input ensures technology fits local context rather than requiring communities to adapt to technology.
Builds Trust
When communities help design tools, they're more likely to trust and use them. This trust is essential for nonprofits working with historically marginalized populations.
Prevents Harm
Community partners can identify potential harms—from privacy concerns to unintended bias—before tools are deployed, preventing damage to relationships and community trust.
Identifying the Right Community Partners
Effective co-design starts with identifying the right partners. Look for organizations and individuals who represent the communities you serve and have established trust within those communities.
Community-Based Organizations
Partner with local nonprofits, community centers, faith-based organizations, and cultural associations that have deep roots in the communities you serve. These organizations understand local needs, communication styles, and trust networks.
- Look for organizations with 5+ years of community presence
- Prioritize partners with diverse leadership that reflects the community
- Seek organizations that have successfully implemented community programs
- Consider partners who have experience with technology adoption (even if not AI-specific)
Community Leaders and Advocates
Engage respected community leaders, advocates, and organizers who can provide cultural context and help bridge communication gaps between technologists and community members.
- Identify leaders who are trusted voices in the community
- Include advocates who understand both community needs and technology potential
- Engage organizers who can facilitate community participation
- Compensate community leaders fairly for their time and expertise
Direct Service Recipients
Include people who will actually use the AI tools in your design process. Their lived experience is invaluable for understanding usability, identifying barriers, and ensuring tools meet real needs.
Structuring the Co-Design Process
A successful co-design process creates space for genuine collaboration, respects community expertise, and produces tools that serve community needs. Here's how to structure it:
Phase 1: Discovery and Relationship Building
Before designing anything, invest time in understanding community needs, existing solutions, and trust networks. This phase is about listening, not proposing solutions.
- Community listening sessions: Hold open forums where community members can share challenges, priorities, and concerns
- Asset mapping: Identify existing community resources, skills, and solutions that could inform AI tool design
- Trust building: Demonstrate commitment to long-term partnership, not just one-time consultation
- Needs assessment: Use participatory methods to identify problems that AI might help solve
Phase 2: Collaborative Problem Definition
Work with community partners to define problems in ways that center community perspectives. Avoid jumping to AI solutions—first ensure you understand the problem correctly.
- Co-create problem statements that reflect community language and priorities
- Identify constraints and requirements from community perspectives
- Discuss what success looks like from community viewpoints
- Explore non-AI solutions alongside AI options
Phase 3: Participatory Design
Engage community members in designing AI tools, not just providing feedback on pre-designed solutions. Use accessible design methods that don't require technical expertise.
- Design workshops: Use visual, hands-on methods like storyboarding, paper prototyping, and role-playing
- User journey mapping: Co-create maps of how community members would interact with AI tools
- Accessibility focus: Ensure design processes accommodate different abilities, languages, and literacy levels
- Iterative feedback: Build prototypes and gather community feedback throughout development
Phase 4: Testing and Refinement
Test AI tools with community members in real contexts, not just controlled environments. Community partners should help identify issues, suggest improvements, and validate that tools work as intended.
Best Practices for Community-Centered AI Design
Compensate Community Partners Fairly
Community expertise is valuable and should be compensated. Pay community partners for their time, expertise, and participation in design processes. This demonstrates respect and ensures participation isn't limited to those who can afford to volunteer.
- Pay fair hourly rates for design participation
- Cover transportation and childcare costs
- Provide meals and refreshments during sessions
- Consider long-term compensation for ongoing advisory roles
Use Accessible Communication Methods
Avoid technical jargon and use communication methods that are accessible to all participants. Translate materials, provide interpretation services, and use visual and interactive methods alongside written materials.
- Provide materials in community languages
- Use visual aids, diagrams, and hands-on activities
- Offer interpretation for multilingual participants
- Create plain-language explanations of AI concepts
Build Long-Term Partnerships
Co-design shouldn't be a one-time consultation. Build ongoing relationships with community partners, creating advisory structures that continue beyond initial design phases.
- Establish community advisory boards for ongoing input
- Create feedback mechanisms for continuous improvement
- Share decision-making power, not just seek input
- Invest in relationship-building outside of specific projects
Center Community Knowledge
Recognize that community members are experts in their own contexts. Center their knowledge and experience in design decisions, rather than treating community input as supplementary to technical expertise.
- Start design sessions with community knowledge sharing
- Document and incorporate community insights into design decisions
- Give community partners decision-making authority, not just advisory roles
- Respect community timelines and priorities
Common Challenges and Solutions
Challenge: Power Imbalances
Nonprofits and technologists often hold more power in design processes than community members, which can limit genuine collaboration.
Solution: Explicitly address power dynamics. Use facilitation techniques that ensure all voices are heard, compensate community partners fairly, and give community members decision-making authority, not just advisory roles.
Challenge: Time and Resource Constraints
Co-design processes take time and resources that nonprofits may struggle to allocate.
Solution: Start small with pilot projects, seek funding specifically for community engagement, and build co-design into grant proposals. The investment pays off in better tools and stronger community relationships.
Challenge: Technical Complexity
AI concepts can be difficult to explain, making it hard for community members to participate meaningfully in design.
Solution: Use analogies, visualizations, and hands-on demonstrations. Focus on what AI tools do and how they affect users, not technical implementation details. Consider working with community tech translators who can bridge technical and community knowledge.
Real-World Examples
Community Health AI Tool
Rural Health Nonprofit
A rural health nonprofit co-designed an AI-powered health information chatbot with local community health workers, patients, and community leaders. The design process revealed that text-based communication wasn't accessible to many community members, leading to a voice-based solution that better served the community.
Key takeaway: Community input identified accessibility barriers that technologists hadn't considered, resulting in a more effective tool.
Housing Assistance Matching System
Urban Housing Nonprofit
An urban housing nonprofit worked with tenants, housing advocates, and community organizations to design an AI system for matching families with housing resources. Community partners identified privacy concerns and bias risks that led to important design changes.
Key takeaway: Community partners' understanding of local context and trust networks was essential for identifying potential harms.
Building Community-Centered AI Tools
Community-centered AI design isn't just a nice-to-have—it's essential for creating tools that truly serve communities and build trust. By co-designing with community partners, nonprofits can ensure AI tools address real needs, respect cultural context, and advance equity rather than perpetuating existing inequalities.
The process requires time, resources, and genuine commitment to partnership. But the investment pays off in better tools, stronger community relationships, and technology that truly serves nonprofit missions. For guidance on ensuring your AI tools advance equity, see our article on using AI for social justice. For help training your team to work effectively with AI, see our guide on AI training for nonprofit teams.
Start small, build relationships, and center community knowledge throughout your AI design process. The communities you serve have the expertise needed to create tools that truly make a difference.
Related Articles
Using AI for Social Justice
Tools to Advance Equity in Nonprofit Work
AI Training for Nonprofit Teams
Building Capacity for Smart, Ethical Tech Use
How Nonprofits Can Adopt Transparent AI Models
Evaluate Your Programs with Explainable AI
Ready to Co-Design AI Tools With Your Community?
Community-centered AI design ensures technology serves local needs and builds trust. Let's explore how to partner with communities to create AI solutions that truly make a difference.