One Hundred Nights
    Back to Articles
    Ethics & Values

    Ethical AI for Nonprofits: How to Use AI Responsibly and Transparently

    In a sector where values matter deeply, ethical AI implementation isn't just good practice—it's essential for maintaining trust, protecting stakeholders, and advancing your mission responsibly. With 82% of nonprofits now using AI but only 10% having formal policies, the gap between adoption and responsible governance demands urgent attention.

    Published: July 15, 2025•18 min read•Ethics & Values
    Ethical AI serving diverse communities fairly with transparency and human oversight

    Updated January 27, 2026: This article has been substantially revised with the latest research, data, and frameworks on ethical AI for nonprofits—including 2025 donor expectation surveys, global regulatory developments like the EU AI Act, and new nonprofit-specific guidance from NTEN, NetHope, and others.

    Nonprofits operate in a unique position where trust, transparency, and ethical behavior are not just important—they're fundamental to mission success. When implementing AI, these values must remain at the forefront of every decision. According to a 2025 Fundraising.AI survey, 92% of donors deem it important that nonprofits clearly disclose where and why AI is used, how humans remain in control, and what evidence shows the technology works. That statistic alone should make ethical AI a board-level priority for every nonprofit.

    Ethical AI implementation goes beyond compliance and technical considerations. It requires a deep commitment to protecting the communities you serve, maintaining transparency with stakeholders, and ensuring that technology advances rather than undermines your mission. For nonprofits, this means ensuring that AI tools enhance rather than replace human connection, serve all community members fairly, and operate in ways that build rather than erode trust. Organizations that get this right will strengthen their donor relationships, improve program outcomes, and position themselves as responsible leaders in an increasingly AI-driven landscape.

    The stakes are particularly high because nonprofits often serve vulnerable populations who may be disproportionately affected by AI bias or exclusion. A 2025 study by Candid's AI Equity Project found that while 64% of nonprofits are now familiar with AI bias (up from 44% in 2024), only 36% are actively implementing equity practices—a figure that actually declined from 46% the prior year. The awareness-to-action gap reveals that knowing about ethical AI and actually practicing it are two very different things.

    This guide provides a comprehensive framework for implementing AI ethically and transparently, drawing on established global standards, nonprofit-specific research, and practical governance strategies. Whether your organization is just beginning to explore AI or is already using multiple tools, these principles will help you build stakeholder trust while leveraging technology to advance your impact. If you're still developing your overall AI strategy, consider reading our strategic planning guide alongside this article.

    The State of Ethical AI in the Nonprofit Sector

    Before diving into frameworks and governance, it's worth understanding where the nonprofit sector currently stands on ethical AI. The picture is one of rapid adoption paired with a concerning governance deficit.

    According to multiple 2025 surveys, approximately 82% of nonprofits are using AI in some capacity—yet only about 10% have formal policies governing its use. Fewer than 4% have dedicated budgets for AI-specific training, and 92% of nonprofits report feeling unprepared for AI implementation. Organizations adopting off-the-shelf AI tools are significantly less likely to have responsible AI policies (35%) compared to those building custom solutions (69%), suggesting that the ease of adopting commercial AI tools may actually discourage organizations from doing the governance work that responsible use requires.

    This governance gap creates real risks. Without formal policies, staff make ad hoc decisions about what data to feed into AI tools, how to communicate AI-generated content to stakeholders, and when human oversight is necessary. The result can be inconsistent practices that erode trust over time—especially when donor data, beneficiary information, or sensitive communications are involved. If your organization hasn't yet created a formal policy, our guide on developing an AI acceptable use policy is a practical starting point.

    The Adoption-Governance Gap

    • 82% of nonprofits use AI, but only 10% have formal policies
    • 92% feel unprepared for AI implementation
    • Over half cite time and staffing as the biggest barriers
    • Fewer than 4% have budgets for AI-specific training

    What Donors Expect

    • 92% want clear disclosure of where and why AI is used
    • 52% expect the ability to opt out of AI-driven interactions
    • 48% want third-party audits of AI systems
    • 34% most worried about "AI bots portrayed as humans"

    Why Ethics Matter in Nonprofit AI

    For nonprofits, ethical AI implementation is not optional—it's essential for maintaining the trust and credibility that enable mission success. The nonprofit sector operates in a unique context where organizations are entrusted with donor funds, beneficiary data, and community relationships. When AI is implemented without careful consideration of ethical implications, it can undermine the very relationships and trust that nonprofits depend on.

    Nonprofits often serve populations who may be disproportionately affected by AI bias or exclusion. Algorithms trained on biased or incomplete datasets can mislabel legitimate organizations as risky—affecting funding decisions—or inadvertently exclude marginalized communities from programs designed to help them. A 2025 research paper published in Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence argues that purely technical solutions to AI bias are insufficient; what's needed is a sociotechnical framework combining algorithmic techniques, human oversight, regulatory mechanisms, and genuine stakeholder engagement. For nonprofits working with vulnerable populations, this makes ethical AI implementation a moral imperative, not just a best practice.

    Stakeholder Trust

    Donors, beneficiaries, and partners trust nonprofits to act in their best interests. Ethical AI use reinforces this trust and demonstrates responsible stewardship. With 92% of donors expecting transparency about AI use, organizations that proactively communicate their ethical commitments will differentiate themselves in an increasingly competitive funding environment.

    Mission Alignment

    AI should advance your mission, not compromise it. Ethical implementation ensures technology serves your values and community needs. As the Stanford Social Innovation Review emphasizes, staying human-centered means AI handles operational heavy lifting while humans ensure accuracy, tone, and mission alignment.

    Risk Mitigation

    Ethical AI practices protect your organization from reputational damage, legal exposure, and stakeholder backlash. With the EU AI Act becoming fully enforceable in 2026 and carrying penalties up to 35 million euros, even nonprofits operating internationally need to understand their compliance obligations. Proactive ethics work is far less costly than reactive damage control.

    Community Protection

    Nonprofits serve communities who may be disproportionately affected by AI bias or misuse. The Algorithmic Justice League has documented how AI systems can encode and amplify historical inequities, making community-centered ethical practices essential for any organization committed to equity and justice.

    Global Standards and Frameworks You Should Know

    Several global frameworks provide guidance for ethical AI implementation. While these were not designed exclusively for nonprofits, they offer valuable principles and structures that can be adapted for the social sector. Understanding these standards helps nonprofits align with international best practices and prepare for an increasingly regulated AI landscape.

    NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF)

    The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology's voluntary framework

    The NIST AI RMF is a voluntary, rights-preserving framework organized around four core functions: Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage. Its 2025 updates expand coverage to generative AI, supply chain vulnerabilities, and new attack models. For nonprofits, the framework provides a structured approach to identifying and managing AI risks without requiring deep technical expertise. The "Govern" function is especially relevant, as it addresses organizational culture, accountability, and stakeholder engagement.

    EU AI Act

    The world's first comprehensive AI regulation

    The EU AI Act entered into force in August 2024 and becomes fully applicable by August 2026. It classifies AI systems by risk level and applies extraterritorially to any organization providing AI systems or outputs within the EU market. Nonprofits operating internationally—or using AI tools developed by EU-based companies—should understand their obligations. AI literacy requirements already applied from February 2025, meaning organizations must ensure staff who interact with AI systems understand the basics of how those systems work and their limitations.

    UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI

    The first global standard on AI ethics, adopted by all 193 member states

    The UNESCO Recommendation establishes core principles including sustainability, privacy, human oversight, transparency, accountability, and multi-stakeholder governance. Its 2025 implementation toolkit introduces an Ethical Impact Assessment (EIA) tool that nonprofits can use to evaluate AI systems before deployment. The Readiness Assessment Methodology has been piloted in over 60 countries and provides a practical roadmap for organizations at any stage of AI adoption.

    Nonprofit-Specific Frameworks

    Sector-tailored guidance from leading organizations

    Several organizations have developed frameworks specifically for the nonprofit and social impact sector:

    • NTEN's AI Framework for an Equitable World — developed through a community-centered process involving dozens of organizations and cross-sector partners, helping nonprofits raise critical questions at any stage of AI decision-making
    • NetHope's AI Ethics Toolkit — developed in collaboration with USAID and MIT D-Lab, focused on building capacity for responsible AI in humanitarian and international development contexts
    • Vera Solutions' Nine Principles — a contextual approach emphasizing that ethical frameworks must reflect community norms, cultural perspectives, and the specific power dynamics present in nonprofit-beneficiary relationships

    Five Pillars of Ethical AI for Nonprofits

    Drawing on both global standards and nonprofit-specific guidance, the following five pillars provide a structured approach to ethical AI implementation. Each pillar includes concrete actions your organization can take, regardless of your current AI maturity level. These pillars align with the principles articulated by the Stanford Social Innovation Review and the NTEN resource hub.

    1

    Transparency & Disclosure

    Be open about your AI use, how it works, and how it affects stakeholders. Transparency builds trust and allows stakeholders to make informed decisions. Research shows that the single greatest donor worry (cited by 34% of respondents) is "AI bots portrayed as humans representing a charity"—making honest disclosure not just ethical but strategically essential. Nonprofits that proactively communicate their AI practices build stronger relationships than those forced to explain after the fact.

    • Clearly disclose when AI is being used in communications, fundraising, and service delivery
    • Explain in plain language how AI decisions are made and what data is used
    • Provide opt-out options for AI-powered services—52% of donors expect this
    • Publish an AI transparency statement on your website documenting which tools you use and how
    2

    Fairness & Non-Discrimination

    Ensure AI systems treat all stakeholders fairly and don't perpetuate or amplify existing biases. This is especially critical for nonprofits, where biased AI outputs can directly harm the communities you exist to serve. The Algorithmic Justice League has documented numerous examples of AI systems encoding historical inequities in areas from facial recognition to language processing. Nonprofits must be vigilant about testing their AI tools across the full diversity of their communities, particularly when cultural competency is at stake.

    • Regularly audit AI systems for bias across demographic groups, including race, gender, age, and disability
    • Verify that training data represents your community's diversity, not just historical patterns
    • Implement human oversight for all high-stakes decisions affecting beneficiaries
    • Run multiple rounds of bias testing before deploying any new AI-powered program feature
    3

    Privacy & Data Protection

    Protect stakeholder privacy and comply with data protection regulations while using AI to advance your mission. Nonprofit data is often highly sensitive—including donor histories, beneficiary records, and personal stories from community members. Feeding this information into public AI tools that learn from inputs could violate privacy expectations or security best practices. Two-thirds of donors name privacy and data security as key concerns when it comes to nonprofit AI use. For a deeper dive into this topic, see our article on donor data privacy in the age of AI.

    • Implement data minimization—collect only what's necessary and limit purpose to stated objectives
    • Obtain explicit consent before using stakeholder data in AI systems, following GDPR and CCPA guidelines
    • Establish clear policies about what data can and cannot be shared with third-party AI tools
    • Use encryption, secure storage, and anonymization techniques—especially for beneficiary data
    4

    Accountability & Oversight

    Establish clear accountability structures and human oversight to ensure AI systems serve your mission and stakeholders effectively. According to the IAPP's 2025 AI Governance Profession Report, 50% of AI governance professionals are assigned to ethics, compliance, privacy, or legal teams—and organizations with dedicated AI governance functions are significantly more likely to be prepared for regulatory compliance. Nonprofits don't need a dedicated AI governance team, but they do need clear lines of responsibility. Building AI champions within your organization can provide the internal expertise and accountability needed.

    • Assign clear responsibility for AI system performance and ethical compliance
    • Implement regular monitoring, evaluation, and reporting on AI outcomes
    • Create escalation procedures for AI-related issues with clear decision-making authority
    • Document all AI tools in use, their purpose, data access, and the person accountable for each
    5

    Mission Alignment & Beneficence

    Ensure AI systems advance your mission and benefit the communities you serve, rather than serving purely operational convenience. As the Vera Solutions framework emphasizes, ethical AI must be contextual—reflecting community norms, cultural perspectives, and the specific power dynamics present in nonprofit-beneficiary relationships. Before adopting any AI tool, ask: does this genuinely serve our beneficiaries, or does it primarily serve organizational efficiency at the expense of human connection?

    • Regularly evaluate AI impact on mission outcomes, not just operational metrics
    • Prioritize stakeholder benefit over organizational efficiency in AI design decisions
    • Engage community members—including beneficiaries—in AI decision-making processes
    • Consider the environmental sustainability of AI adoption alongside its social impact

    Confronting AI Bias: A Deeper Look

    AI bias deserves special attention in the nonprofit context because its consequences fall disproportionately on the communities nonprofits serve. Bias in AI systems arises when training data reflects historical or systemic inequities, when models inadvertently favor certain groups, or when the people building and deploying AI tools don't reflect the diversity of the people those tools affect.

    The Candid AI Equity Project's 2025 findings paint a nuanced picture: awareness of AI bias has increased significantly (64% familiarity in 2025, up from 44% in 2024), but the percentage of organizations implementing equity practices actually dropped from 46% to 36%. Researchers attribute this decline to limited organizational capacity rather than unwillingness—suggesting that nonprofits need more practical, resource-appropriate guidance on turning awareness into action. If your organization is working to address systemic inequalities, our guide on using AI to map and mitigate program inequalities offers complementary strategies.

    Common Sources of Bias in Nonprofit AI

    • Historical data bias: Training data that reflects past discriminatory practices (e.g., grant databases that historically favored certain types of organizations or communities)
    • Representation bias: Datasets that underrepresent certain communities, languages, or cultural contexts, leading AI to perform poorly for marginalized groups
    • Measurement bias: Using proxies or metrics that don't accurately capture outcomes for all communities (e.g., measuring "engagement" in ways that favor digitally connected populations)
    • Deployment bias: AI tools designed for one context being applied to different populations without recalibration or cultural adaptation

    Practical Bias Mitigation Steps

    • Conduct pre-deployment testing: Before launching any AI-powered feature, test outputs across demographic groups. Run multiple rounds of testing and involve diverse testers
    • Establish feedback channels: Create easy ways for community members to flag concerns about AI outputs, and commit to investigating every report
    • Diversify AI decision-making: Include community members, staff from different backgrounds, and external experts in decisions about AI tool selection and deployment
    • Monitor outcomes continuously: Track AI-influenced outcomes disaggregated by demographic groups to identify disparate impacts early

    Building Ethical AI Governance

    Effective ethical AI implementation requires clear governance structures that ensure responsible use and continuous improvement. Governance doesn't have to mean bureaucracy—for smaller nonprofits, it can be as simple as designating an AI lead, documenting your AI tools and policies, and scheduling regular reviews. The key is intentionality: making deliberate choices rather than letting AI adoption happen by default. Our guide to building an AI ethics committee provides detailed steps for organizations ready to formalize their governance.

    1

    Create an AI Ethics Committee or Designate an AI Lead

    Establish a cross-functional group—or at minimum, a single designated person—responsible for overseeing AI ethics. Include staff, board members, and ideally community representatives. This body should review new AI tool adoptions, monitor existing tools, and serve as the escalation point for ethical concerns. Even small nonprofits benefit from having someone explicitly accountable for AI decisions rather than leaving responsibility diffuse.

    2

    Develop Comprehensive AI Policies

    Create policies that define acceptable AI use, data handling practices, and stakeholder rights. The Whole Whale analysis of top nonprofit AI policies found that effective policies cover privacy, security, data ethics, transparency, and inclusiveness. They should also address what types of decisions AI can support versus those requiring human judgment, and how AI-generated content should be reviewed and disclosed. For templates and examples, see our guide on AI policy templates for nonprofits.

    3

    Implement Regular Audits and Assessments

    Conduct regular audits of AI systems to assess performance, identify bias, and ensure compliance with your ethical guidelines. UNESCO's Ethical Impact Assessment tool provides a structured approach. Audits should examine both technical performance (accuracy, fairness metrics) and organizational impact (mission alignment, stakeholder satisfaction, community trust). 48% of donors want third-party audits of AI systems, so consider engaging external reviewers periodically. Our guide on evaluating AI tools through an ethics lens can help structure your assessment process.

    4

    Invest in Staff Training and AI Literacy

    Train all staff on ethical AI principles, data protection requirements, and responsible AI use. The EU AI Act already requires AI literacy for staff interacting with AI systems, and NTEN offers a 13-course AI for Nonprofits certificate specifically designed for the sector. Training should address both the practical (how to use tools safely) and the conceptual (understanding bias, privacy, and ethical implications). Our article on building AI literacy in nonprofit teams provides a structured approach to developing organization-wide competency.

    5

    Start Small, Pilot, and Scale Responsibly

    The SSIR framework recommends four-to-six-week pilot experiments to demonstrate value before scaling AI across your organization. Starting small reduces risk, builds institutional learning, and gives your team time to develop the ethical muscles needed for larger deployments. Document lessons learned from each pilot—both successes and failures—to inform future decisions and build organizational knowledge about responsible AI use.

    Data Privacy and Protection in Practice

    Data privacy deserves its own section because it sits at the intersection of ethics, law, and trust. As Independent Sector emphasizes, data privacy and its intersection with AI should be critical in an organization's strategic management. For nonprofits, the stakes are high: you hold donor financial information, beneficiary personal data, volunteer records, and community stories—all of which require careful handling when AI enters the picture.

    The regulatory landscape is evolving rapidly. GDPR and CCPA set baseline requirements, but the EU AI Act adds new obligations around transparency, data governance, and human oversight that apply to AI systems specifically. Updated ISO/IEC standards (including ISO 27701 for privacy and ISO 42001 for AI management) provide comprehensive frameworks for organizations looking to formalize their approach. For a detailed look at how data governance intersects with AI, see our article on developing a data governance policy for AI.

    What to Protect

    • Donor personal and financial information
    • Beneficiary records, case notes, and personal stories
    • Internal communications and strategic documents
    • Program evaluation data containing personally identifiable information

    How to Protect It

    • Establish clear policies about what data can be shared with AI tools
    • Use enterprise AI tools that don't train on your data
    • Anonymize or de-identify data before AI processing
    • Conduct regular privacy impact assessments for AI-enabled processes

    Transparency Best Practices

    Transparency is the foundation of donor and community trust. With 92% of donors expecting clear disclosure about AI use, nonprofits that lead with transparency will build stronger, more resilient relationships. Transparency isn't just about compliance—it's about demonstrating that your organization's commitment to integrity extends to how you adopt and use technology.

    Clear Communication

    How you communicate about AI use directly shapes stakeholder perception. Use plain language, not technical jargon, and be proactive rather than reactive.

    • Clearly label AI-generated content in newsletters, appeals, and social media
    • Publish an AI use statement on your website explaining which tools you use and why
    • Provide a point of contact for AI-related questions from donors and beneficiaries
    • Include AI disclosures in your annual report alongside other accountability measures

    Stakeholder Rights

    Respecting stakeholder autonomy means giving people meaningful choices about how AI affects their interactions with your organization.

    • Provide opt-out options for AI-powered services—52% of donors expect this
    • Allow stakeholders to access, correct, or delete their data
    • Offer human alternatives for all AI-mediated interactions
    • Never present AI bots as humans—the #1 donor concern about nonprofit AI

    Accountability and Reporting

    Accountability means taking responsibility for AI outcomes—both positive and negative—and being transparent about how you're learning and improving.

    • Take public responsibility for AI system outcomes, including mistakes
    • Establish and communicate clear escalation procedures for issues
    • Report regularly on AI performance, impact, and lessons learned
    • Consider periodic third-party audits and share results with stakeholders

    Resources for Ethical AI in Nonprofits

    The ethical AI landscape is evolving rapidly, and staying informed is part of responsible governance. The following organizations and resources provide ongoing guidance, training, and community support specifically for the nonprofit sector.

    Training and Community

    • NTEN — AI for Nonprofits certificate program, community forums, and resource hub
    • NetHope — AI Ethics Toolkit developed with USAID and MIT D-Lab
    • Responsible AI Institute — RAISE Pathways program with 1,100+ controls mapped across 17 global standards

    Standards and Frameworks

    For additional reading on related topics within our own library, explore our articles on data privacy in ethical AI tools, data privacy and security with AI, and building algorithm review boards.

    Conclusion: Ethics as an Ongoing Commitment

    Ethical AI implementation is not a one-time checklist—it's an ongoing commitment to responsible technology use that evolves alongside the tools themselves. The World Economic Forum's January 2026 report on scaling trustworthy AI emphasizes that ethical AI has evolved "from an abstract aspiration to an operational necessity," requiring standards, methodologies, and governance mechanisms that can scale with adoption. For nonprofits, this means building ethics into your organizational culture, not just your policies.

    The gap between AI adoption and responsible governance in the nonprofit sector is real but addressable. Organizations don't need perfect policies before they start using AI—but they do need intentional practices, clear accountability, and a genuine commitment to transparency. The research is clear: donors, beneficiaries, and communities are watching how nonprofits handle AI, and those that lead with ethics will earn the trust that sustains long-term impact.

    Start where you are. If you haven't created an AI policy yet, do that first. If you have a policy but no governance structure, designate an AI lead. If you have governance but haven't trained your team, invest in AI literacy. Each step forward strengthens your organization's ability to use AI in ways that honor your mission, protect your communities, and build the trust that makes your work possible. For a comprehensive starting point, our nonprofit leaders' guide to AI covers the full landscape of AI adoption for mission-driven organizations.

    Ready to Implement Ethical AI?

    Discover how One Hundred Nights can help your nonprofit implement AI ethically and transparently, building stakeholder trust while advancing your mission.

    Implement Ethical AIExplore Our Services