Faith and Technology: Addressing Theological and Ethical Concerns About AI Adoption
As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly prevalent in religious and faith-based nonprofit work, leaders face profound questions about the intersection of technology and spirituality. This comprehensive guide explores the theological concerns, ethical considerations, and practical frameworks that faith communities need to navigate AI adoption thoughtfully—honoring both technological possibility and spiritual integrity.
The 2025 State of AI in the Church survey revealed a striking paradox: 91% of church leaders welcome AI in ministry, yet 73% have no AI policy whatsoever. Church leaders' primary concerns center on "theological misalignment" (29%) and "replacement of human interactions" (23%). Meanwhile, AI adoption has surged—45% of church leaders now use AI frequently, representing an 80% increase from the previous year.
This rapid adoption without corresponding governance reveals a critical gap. Faith-based organizations are embracing technology's efficiency while grappling with fundamental questions about its spiritual implications. Can AI provide legitimate spiritual counsel? Should the Holy Spirit's role in Scripture interpretation be understood differently when AI is involved? What does it mean for worship content to be AI-generated? These aren't merely technical questions—they're theological ones that touch the core of religious identity and practice.
The challenges extend beyond individual congregations. A growing number of Americans are turning to AI tools for spiritual guidance, with AI-powered applications expanding into prayer, reflection, and scriptural interpretation. Yet AI systems can generate text that appears theologically sound without believing, worshiping, or holding convictions. They don't know God. Their suggestions, while often convincing, are neither prayerful nor prophetic.
This article explores how faith-based nonprofits and religious organizations can thoughtfully navigate AI adoption. We'll examine theological concerns across different faith traditions, explore ethical frameworks that honor religious values, and provide practical guidance for implementing AI in ways that enhance rather than compromise spiritual integrity. Whether you lead a church, mosque, temple, or faith-based nonprofit, these considerations can help you approach technology with both wisdom and discernment.
The Theological Landscape: Core Concerns Across Faith Traditions
While specific concerns vary across religious traditions, faith leaders from diverse backgrounds share common questions about AI's role in spiritual life. Understanding these concerns provides essential context for developing thoughtful approaches to technology adoption.
Research using the Flourishing AI Christian (FAI-C) Benchmark evaluated 20 AI models across seven core dimensions of Christian theology. The Faith dimension scored lowest, averaging just 48 out of 100, with most models struggling to coherently discuss foundational concepts like grace, sin, forgiveness, and biblical authority. Faith and spirituality remain the most difficult dimension across frontier AI models, with mainstream systems defaulting to generic or secular advice rather than biblically grounded guidance, even when faith-based prompts are given.
This technical limitation points to a deeper theological challenge: AI's fundamental inability to participate in the spiritual realities it discusses. Religious leaders across traditions emphasize that AI is not and cannot be divine. AI training data is sourced by humans, and its moral principles are only those its creators consciously inject. This limitation has profound implications for how faith communities approach technology.
Christian Perspectives
Theological considerations from Christian traditions
Christian leaders emphasize human dignity as created in God's image, the unique value of human beings, and the role of the Holy Spirit in discernment and interpretation. Key concerns include whether AI can legitimately provide pastoral care, how AI-generated worship content relates to Spirit-led creativity, and maintaining the human relationships central to Christian community.
- AI must remain under human control and serve human flourishing
- Technology should enhance, not replace, authentic spiritual relationships
- Maintaining biblical perspectives on human uniqueness and dignity
- Ensuring AI use aligns with denominational theology and practice
Jewish Perspectives
Theological considerations from Jewish traditions
Jewish ethics revolve around "Tikkun olam"—the responsibility to repair the world—which may be applied to AI to address societal challenges and enhance human well-being. Jewish thought brings distinct perspectives on human agency, ethical responsibility, and the relationship between innovation and tradition.
- Technology as tool for Tikkun olam (repairing the world)
- Maintaining human agency and ethical responsibility
- Balancing innovation with preservation of tradition
- Ensuring technology serves justice and community well-being
Islamic Perspectives
Theological considerations from Islamic traditions
Islamic scholars are developing comprehensive ethical frameworks for AI based on principles like justice, human dignity, and the common good. These frameworks emphasize that technology must serve humanity's spiritual and material well-being while respecting divine sovereignty and human moral responsibility.
- AI development must honor human dignity (karamah)
- Technology should promote justice ('adl) and common good (maslahah)
- Maintaining human accountability before God for technology use
- Ensuring AI applications align with Islamic ethical principles
Interfaith Common Ground
Shared concerns across religious traditions
Religious traditions share common concerns about AI, emphasizing ethical responsibility, human dignity, and mindful innovation. An interfaith declaration signed by Christian and Jewish leaders calls for AI to be developed within ethical boundaries that preserve human dignity, prevent harm, and ensure technology remains under human control.
- Preserving human dignity in technological systems
- Ensuring AI serves the common good and promotes justice
- Maintaining human relationships as central to spiritual life
- Approaching technology with compassion, responsibility, and wisdom
Essential Theological Questions for Faith Leaders
Before implementing AI in religious settings, faith leaders should wrestle with foundational theological questions. These aren't abstract intellectual exercises—they have practical implications for how technology is deployed, what guardrails are established, and how communities understand the role of AI in spiritual life.
The challenge is that many of these questions don't have simple answers. Different theological traditions will approach them differently, and even within traditions, thoughtful people may disagree. The goal isn't necessarily reaching unanimous consensus but engaging in discernment that honors both theological integrity and the real needs of faith communities.
Critical Questions for Theological Reflection
Essential considerations before implementing AI in faith-based settings
Can AI Provide Legitimate Spiritual Counsel?
This question cuts to the heart of pastoral care. AI systems can generate compassionate-sounding responses and offer practical advice, but they don't participate in the spiritual realities they discuss. They don't pray, experience God's presence, or offer wisdom born from faith. If spiritual counsel requires spiritual discernment—something beyond pattern recognition and text generation—then AI's role must be carefully bounded. Most faith leaders conclude that AI can support administrative aspects of pastoral care but cannot replace the human-to-human and human-to-divine relationships essential to spiritual guidance.
What Is the Holy Spirit's Role When AI Interprets Scripture?
Many Christian traditions emphasize the Holy Spirit's role in illuminating Scripture and guiding interpretation. When AI analyzes biblical texts and offers interpretations, how should this be understood theologically? AI processes text based on patterns in training data, not through spiritual illumination. This distinction matters for how AI-generated biblical insights are presented and received. They might offer scholarly analysis or summarize interpretive traditions, but they shouldn't be framed as spiritually authoritative. Some religious leaders suggest AI tools should include disclaimers clarifying they don't replace prayerful study or Spirit-led interpretation.
What Does Creator Identity Mean for AI-Generated Worship?
When AI generates prayers, liturgy, sermon outlines, or worship songs, who is the creator? This question matters because many faith traditions view worship as an offering to God, expressing human creativity, devotion, and response to divine revelation. If AI generates worship content, is it authentic worship or merely words arranged by algorithm? Some leaders resolve this by viewing AI as a tool that extends human creativity—similar to how a musical instrument extends musical expression—rather than as an independent creator. The human who prompts, curates, and ultimately presents the content retains responsibility for its spiritual integrity.
How Do We Prevent Dependency on AI for Faith Guidance?
Experts warn that dependency on AI may erode the human relationships central to religious life, including mentorship, confession, and pastoral care. When people turn to AI chatbots for spiritual questions instead of engaging with faith communities, something essential is lost. Faith leaders must consider how to implement AI in ways that enhance rather than replace human spiritual relationships. This might mean using AI for administrative tasks that free up time for deeper pastoral engagement rather than using it to automate spiritual guidance itself.
How Does AI Affect Understanding of Human Uniqueness?
Most faith traditions affirm human beings as unique—created in the divine image, bearers of souls, possessing inherent dignity that transcends utility. As AI systems become more sophisticated in mimicking human communication and reasoning, how do faith communities maintain clear understanding of what makes humans distinct? This isn't merely philosophical—it shapes how technology is deployed and what limits are placed on its use. Religious leaders emphasize that AI should be used as a tool to enhance human flourishing, not as a substitute for human presence, judgment, or relationship.
What Level of Transparency Is Theologically Required?
When faith communities use AI tools, what should be disclosed to members? If a prayer is AI-assisted, should that be acknowledged? If sermon research used AI, does the congregation need to know? These questions relate to honesty, trust, and authenticity—core values in most religious traditions. The lack of spiritual grounding in AI means users seeking guidance may encounter statements that reflect bias, misinterpret scripture, or promote ideas incompatible with their faith tradition. Transparency allows community members to engage AI outputs with appropriate discernment rather than mistaking them for authoritative spiritual teaching.
Wrestling with these questions doesn't mean rejecting AI. Rather, it means approaching technology with the same theological seriousness that faith communities bring to other significant decisions. The Journal of Lutheran Ethics' December 2025/January 2026 issue on "Artificial Intelligence, Spirituality, and the Church" provides extensive essays exploring these questions from various angles, demonstrating how theological reflection can inform practical technology decisions.
These theological questions also connect to practical policy development. Organizations that engage deeply with theological concerns are better positioned to create AI policies that reflect their values, establish appropriate boundaries, and maintain community trust. The next section explores how this theological foundation translates into ethical frameworks and governance structures.
Ethical Frameworks: Translating Theology into Practice
Theological reflection provides the foundation, but faith-based organizations also need practical ethical frameworks to guide AI implementation. Several religious bodies and interfaith initiatives have developed principles that translate theological commitments into actionable guidance.
In 2023, the Southern Baptist Convention adopted a resolution on artificial intelligence urging "utmost care and discernment, upholding the unique nature of humanity as the crowning achievement of God's creation." In March 2024, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints issued Guiding Principles stating "AI does not replace divinely appointed sources, but, if used correctly, it can be a powerful tool for helping earnest seekers of truth search and access such sources." In April 2019, sixty evangelical leaders issued a declaration providing an ethical framework for evangelical churches.
The Joint Statement on Ethics and Artificial Intelligence, signed by Christian and Jewish leaders in October 2024, calls for five essential principles that reflect shared religious values across traditions: accuracy, transparency, privacy and security, human dignity, and the common good. These principles provide a framework that can guide faith-based organizations regardless of specific theological tradition.
Five Core Ethical Principles for Faith-Based AI
Guiding values from interfaith collaboration on AI ethics
Accuracy and Truthfulness
AI systems should provide accurate information and honest representations of their capabilities and limitations. For faith communities, this means ensuring AI doesn't misrepresent theological positions, fabricate scriptural references, or present culturally biased interpretations as universal truths. Regular verification of AI outputs against authoritative sources and theological expertise helps maintain accuracy.
Transparency and Explainability
Faith communities should be clear about when and how AI is being used, what its limitations are, and how decisions are made. This includes disclosing AI assistance in content creation, explaining how AI systems work at appropriate levels of detail, and creating opportunities for community members to ask questions and raise concerns. Transparency builds trust and allows for informed consent.
Privacy and Security
Religious organizations handle deeply personal information—spiritual struggles, prayer requests, pastoral counseling notes, financial giving. AI systems must protect this sensitive data with robust security measures and clear data governance policies. Faith-based organizations should be particularly cautious about sharing sensitive spiritual data with third-party AI vendors and should establish clear policies about data retention, access, and deletion.
Human Dignity and Flourishing
All AI implementation should honor the inherent dignity of human beings as recognized across faith traditions. This means AI must remain under human control, serve human well-being, and never be used in ways that diminish human worth or agency. Technology should enhance human capacity for spiritual growth, community connection, and service rather than replacing the irreplaceable aspects of human spiritual experience.
Common Good and Justice
AI should be deployed in ways that serve the common good, promote justice, and avoid perpetuating inequality or discrimination. For faith-based organizations serving diverse communities, this requires particular attention to how AI systems might disadvantage marginalized populations. It also means considering whether resources spent on AI might be better used for direct service, and ensuring technology efficiency doesn't come at the cost of human connection or spiritual depth.
These principles align closely with the interfaith AI ethics work being done through initiatives like AI and Faith, which connects technology creators, ethicists, theologians, and religious leaders to engage with moral and ethical issues around artificial intelligence. Such collaborations demonstrate how religious communities can contribute wisdom from diverse traditions—Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, and others—to broader conversations about responsible AI development.
Importantly, these ethical frameworks recognize that technology is never neutral. AI systems reflect the values, assumptions, and biases of their creators. For faith-based organizations, this means actively choosing vendors and tools that align with religious values, customizing systems to reflect theological commitments, and remaining vigilant about unintended consequences that might conflict with spiritual priorities.
Practical Implementation: Balancing Innovation and Integrity
With theological reflection and ethical principles established, the question becomes: how do faith-based organizations actually implement AI in ways that honor both efficiency and spiritual integrity? The answer lies in what some leaders call "AI-enhanced, not AI-dependent" ministry—using technology to support human connection rather than replacing it.
Current patterns show that while 91% of church leaders welcome AI, fewer than 25% use it for theological content like sermons or devotionals. Instead, most lean on AI for administrative tasks, communication support, and discipleship resources. This distribution reflects wisdom: using AI where it excels (organizing information, drafting communications, managing logistics) while preserving human leadership in areas requiring spiritual discernment, pastoral sensitivity, and authentic relationship.
The challenge is no longer whether faith communities adopt AI, but how they use it with discernment so that technology enriches faith rather than hollowing it out. This requires intentional frameworks that guide implementation from planning through evaluation.
The PDLD Framework for Faith-Based AI Implementation
A practical process for thoughtful technology adoption
Pray: Seek Spiritual Discernment
Begin with prayer and spiritual reflection rather than purely pragmatic analysis. Ask for wisdom in understanding if and how AI might serve your faith community. Consider involving multiple voices in this discernment—leadership, staff, congregants, and theological advisors. This spiritual grounding ensures technology decisions align with mission rather than being driven solely by efficiency or trend-following.
Learn: Develop AI Literacy Across Leadership
Educate yourself and your leadership team about AI's capabilities, limitations, and potential implications for ministry. This isn't about becoming technical experts but understanding enough to make informed decisions. Learn what AI can and cannot do, where bias commonly emerges, and what safeguards are necessary. Consider reading theological reflections on AI from your tradition and engaging with resources like the Future of Life Institute's religious projects on AI challenges.
Discuss: Engage Community in Open Dialogue
Create opportunities for respectful, open conversation about technology use within your faith community. Don't announce AI adoption as a fait accompli; instead, invite input on where technology might be helpful and where it feels inappropriate. Address concerns directly and honestly. These conversations build trust, surface important perspectives, and help identify which applications of AI will be accepted versus those that might damage community cohesion.
Discern: Align Technology with Mission and Values
Carefully consider how any technology aligns with your organization's mission and values. Ask: Will this AI tool enhance our ability to serve our spiritual mission? Does it honor the theological principles we've identified as important? Are there aspects of this technology that conflict with our values? This discernment phase should involve both leadership and community input, resulting in clear decisions about what AI applications to pursue and which to avoid.
Beyond this foundational framework, faith-based organizations should consider specific practices that help maintain spiritual integrity while using AI tools. These include establishing clear policies about appropriate and inappropriate uses, creating review processes for AI-generated content before it's shared with the community, and maintaining human oversight of all decisions with spiritual or pastoral significance.
Some organizations are drafting internal policies including ethical boundaries, doctrinal review systems, and disclaimers to prevent users from mistaking AI output for divine insight or authorized teaching. For example, AI-generated sermon research might be reviewed by theologically trained staff, AI-assisted prayer suggestions might include disclaimers that they're starting points for personal prayer rather than authoritative spiritual guidance, and AI translations of religious texts might be verified against established translations and scholarly resources.
Appropriate and Inappropriate Uses: Drawing Clear Boundaries
One of the most practical questions faith leaders face is: where should we use AI, and where should we not? While specific answers will vary by theological tradition and organizational context, general patterns are emerging based on where AI adds value without compromising spiritual integrity.
The best strategy for an AI-powered future is not just adopting technology but doubling down on what makes faith communities irreplaceable: authentic relationships, transformative teaching, and Spirit-led ministry. AI should free up time and energy for these core activities rather than attempting to automate them.
Generally Appropriate AI Uses
Applications that enhance ministry without compromising spiritual integrity
- Administrative Support: Scheduling, email management, meeting notes, calendar coordination—tasks that consume time but don't require spiritual discernment
- Communication Drafting: Newsletters, announcements, website content—with human review before publication
- Research Assistance: Gathering background information for sermons, finding relevant scripture passages, summarizing theological resources—as a starting point for human study
- Translation Support: Making content accessible in multiple languages, with cultural review by native speakers
- Accessibility Enhancement: Transcription, captioning, audio descriptions—making spiritual content accessible to people with disabilities
- Resource Organization: Cataloging theological libraries, organizing historical records, managing digital archives
- Personalized Learning Paths: AI can recommend sermons, devotionals, and study materials based on individual learning styles and faith journeys—as suggestions rather than prescriptions
Questionable or Inappropriate AI Uses
Applications requiring extreme caution or avoidance
- Direct Spiritual Guidance: AI chatbots offering pastoral counseling, confession, or spiritual direction without human oversight—lacks authentic spiritual presence
- Automated Sermons or Teachings: Using AI-generated content as authoritative spiritual teaching without significant human theological review and customization
- Prayer Generation: AI-written prayers presented as spiritually equivalent to human prayer—lacks the authentic relationship with the divine that prayer expresses
- Definitive Scripture Interpretation: Presenting AI's biblical analysis as theologically authoritative rather than as one perspective requiring human spiritual discernment
- Replacing Human Pastoral Care: Using AI to reduce or eliminate human pastoral presence rather than to support and enhance it
- Unmonitored Children's Spiritual Formation: AI tools for children's spiritual education without parental or educator oversight and theological review
- Automated Theological Decisions: Using AI to make doctrinal determinations, resolve theological disputes, or determine membership/leadership eligibility
These boundaries aren't absolute—some applications in the "questionable" category might be appropriate with sufficient safeguards, theological review, and transparency. The key is approaching each use case thoughtfully, asking what's being gained and what might be lost, and ensuring technology serves rather than replaces the human and divine relationships at the heart of spiritual life.
Faith-based organizations should also consider how AI use affects data privacy and security. Religious organizations handle deeply personal information, and data breaches are particularly concerning considering the sensitive nature of spiritual, financial, and personal data. Before implementing any AI tool, organizations should understand how data is stored, who has access to it, whether it's used for training AI models, and what happens if the vendor relationship ends. Consider exploring guidance on strategic AI implementation that addresses privacy and security concerns.
Developing AI Policies for Faith-Based Organizations
Given that 73% of churches have no AI policy despite 91% of leaders welcoming the technology, there's an urgent need for governance structures. AI policies aren't about limiting innovation—they're about ensuring technology use aligns with organizational values and protects the community.
Effective AI policies for faith-based organizations address multiple dimensions: theological boundaries, acceptable and prohibited uses, data privacy and security, transparency requirements, review processes, accountability structures, and ongoing evaluation. These policies should be developed collaboratively, involving leadership, staff, theological advisors, and community representatives.
Essential Elements of Faith-Based AI Policies
Key components to include in organizational AI governance
- Theological Foundation Statement: Clear articulation of the theological principles guiding AI use, referencing specific denominational positions or interfaith frameworks adopted by the organization
- Acceptable Use Guidelines: Specific examples of approved AI applications and clear boundaries around inappropriate uses, particularly for theological content and pastoral care
- Doctrinal Review Requirements: Processes for theological review of AI-generated content before it's shared with the community, including who conducts review and what standards are applied
- Transparency and Disclosure Standards: When and how AI use must be disclosed to the community, including labeling requirements for AI-generated or AI-assisted content
- Data Privacy Protections: Clear policies about what data can be shared with AI systems, how it's protected, and who has access—especially important for pastoral counseling notes, prayer requests, and financial information
- Opt-Out Provisions: Mechanisms for community members to opt out of AI-mediated interactions while still receiving full access to spiritual care and community life
- Accountability Structures: Clear designation of who is responsible for AI oversight, how concerns are raised and addressed, and what happens when problems are identified
- Regular Review and Adaptation: Scheduled policy reviews to account for technology evolution, community feedback, and emerging theological reflection on AI
Organizations can learn from denominational examples. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints' Guiding Principles for AI Use and the Southern Baptist Convention's resolution on artificial intelligence demonstrate how theological convictions can translate into practical guidance. The Future of Life Institute's request for proposals on religious projects tackling AI challenges, with funding decisions expected in May 2026, may generate additional frameworks and resources for faith-based organizations.
Policy development shouldn't be a one-time event but an ongoing process. As AI capabilities evolve and faith communities gain experience with these tools, policies should be revisited and refined. Creating regular review cycles—perhaps annually or biannually—ensures policies remain relevant and responsive to both technological change and community needs.
Finally, policies are only as effective as their implementation. Organizations should invest in training staff on AI policies, creating clear processes for review and approval, and establishing accountability mechanisms that ensure policies are followed rather than ignored. This might include developing internal AI review committees, creating templates and checklists for common AI applications, and establishing clear escalation paths when questions or concerns arise.
Looking Forward: Faith Communities and the AI Future
The intersection of faith and technology will only become more significant in coming years. As AI systems become more sophisticated and integrated into daily life, faith communities face both opportunities and challenges in maintaining spiritual integrity while engaging with powerful new tools.
Initiatives like the Religious Voices and Responsible AI project—focusing on evangelical Christian churches in Southern California and mosques in the San Francisco Bay Area and Seattle in its pilot year—demonstrate growing recognition that religious perspectives are essential to shaping ethical AI development. Faith communities bring wisdom about human dignity, moral responsibility, community care, and transcendent purpose that purely secular approaches to AI ethics may miss.
Organizations like AI and Faith are actively working to connect technology creators, ethicists, theologians, and religious leaders in ongoing dialogue about AI's moral and ethical dimensions. This cross-sector collaboration ensures that faith perspectives inform not just how religious organizations use AI but how AI systems are designed and deployed across society.
For individual faith-based nonprofits and congregations, the path forward requires both courage and caution. Courage to engage with technology thoughtfully rather than rejecting it out of fear. Caution to move deliberately, ensuring theological reflection precedes implementation. The organizations that successfully navigate this balance will be those that remain grounded in their spiritual foundations while thoughtfully adapting to technological change.
This means investing in AI literacy across leadership and staff, creating robust governance structures, building community trust through transparency, and remaining vigilant about unintended consequences. It means being willing to experiment while also being willing to step back when technology isn't serving spiritual purposes well. Most importantly, it means maintaining focus on what matters most—the authentic human-to-human and human-to-divine relationships that constitute the heart of religious life.
The challenge ahead isn't whether faith communities will use AI but whether they'll use it wisely, guided by theological conviction and ethical principle rather than mere pragmatism or technological enthusiasm. Those who approach this challenge with prayer, discernment, and commitment to their core spiritual values will find ways to leverage technology that genuinely enhance ministry without compromising what makes faith communities irreplaceable.
Conclusion
The rapid adoption of AI across faith-based organizations presents both unprecedented opportunities and profound challenges. While 91% of church leaders welcome AI in ministry, the theological questions it raises—about the nature of spiritual guidance, the role of human relationship in religious life, and the boundaries between human and machine intelligence—demand serious engagement rather than superficial enthusiasm.
This article has explored how faith communities can approach AI with both openness and discernment. By grounding technology decisions in theological reflection, establishing ethical frameworks aligned with religious values, and implementing practical policies that protect spiritual integrity, faith-based organizations can harness AI's benefits while avoiding its pitfalls.
The key is maintaining clear priorities: AI should be AI-enhanced, not AI-dependent ministry. Technology should free up time and energy for the irreplaceable aspects of spiritual life—authentic relationships, transformative teaching, pastoral care, and Spirit-led discernment. When AI serves these purposes, it can be a valuable tool. When it attempts to replace them, it fundamentally misunderstands what makes faith communities meaningful.
For faith leaders navigating these decisions, the PDLD framework—Pray, Learn, Discuss, Discern—offers a practical process that honors both spiritual values and technological realities. Beginning with prayer rather than pragmatism, educating leadership rather than rushing to implement, engaging community in dialogue rather than imposing decisions, and carefully discerning alignment with mission and values creates a foundation for wise technology choices.
As your faith community considers AI adoption, remember that you're not alone in this discernment. Denominational bodies are developing frameworks, interfaith collaborations are establishing ethical principles, and organizations like AI and Faith are creating resources specifically for religious contexts. Drawing on these collective insights can help inform your own local decisions.
Most importantly, maintain confidence that the theological and spiritual wisdom within your tradition is sufficient to guide these decisions. The same principles that have guided faith communities through previous technological revolutions—from printing presses to broadcast media to the internet—remain relevant for AI. Human dignity, community care, authentic relationship, moral responsibility, and pursuit of transcendent purpose aren't rendered obsolete by new technology. Rather, they provide the enduring foundation for determining how—and whether—to embrace it.
Need Guidance on AI for Your Faith-Based Organization?
One Hundred Nights helps faith-based nonprofits develop AI strategies that honor theological values, enhance ministry effectiveness, and maintain spiritual integrity. Let's explore how technology can serve your mission.