Back to Articles
    Agentic AI & Automation

    Gartner Predicts 40% of Enterprise Apps Will Have AI Agents by 2026: What Nonprofits Need to Know

    The software your nonprofit relies on every day is about to change in a fundamental way. Gartner's landmark prediction that 40% of enterprise applications will embed task-specific AI agents by 2026 isn't a distant forecast. It's already happening, and the implications for how nonprofits operate, fundraise, and deliver programs are significant.

    Published: February 21, 202610 min readAgentic AI & Automation
    AI agents embedded in nonprofit enterprise software

    In August 2025, research firm Gartner published a prediction that sent ripples through the technology industry: by the end of 2026, 40% of enterprise software applications will feature task-specific AI agents, up from less than 5% just one year earlier. For context, this is an extraordinary rate of change. Very few technologies have achieved this level of integration across an entire software category in such a short timeframe.

    For nonprofit leaders, this prediction carries particular weight. Unlike large corporations with dedicated technology teams and significant IT budgets, nonprofits often depend heavily on third-party platforms. Your donor management CRM, your grant management system, your volunteer coordination software, your accounting platform: all of these are enterprise applications that are actively embedding AI agent capabilities right now. Whether your organization has a formal AI strategy or not, AI agents are coming to your existing tools.

    Understanding what this shift means in practical terms, how to leverage it intelligently, and how to guard against its risks, is now an essential leadership competency. This article walks through what Gartner actually said, what's already changing in nonprofit-specific software, how to think about the five stages of agentic AI evolution, and what preparation looks like for organizations of different sizes and sophistication levels.

    This isn't about hype. It's about helping you make informed decisions as the tools you already pay for become increasingly capable of acting on your behalf, with or without your explicit instruction. That combination of capability and autonomy requires thoughtful preparation.

    What Gartner Actually Predicted

    Gartner's August 2025 prediction is more nuanced than the headline number suggests. Senior Director Analyst Anushree Verma described a five-stage evolutionary model for how AI agents will transform enterprise software over the next several years. Each stage builds on the previous one, moving from simple assistance toward fully autonomous, multi-system operation.

    The broader vision is staggering in its long-term scope: Gartner's best-case scenario projects that agentic AI could account for approximately 30% of enterprise application software revenue by 2035, potentially exceeding $450 billion, up from roughly 2% in 2025. This represents one of the largest technology market transitions in history, and it's being built directly into the applications that organizations of all types already use.

    12025: AI Assistants in Most Applications

    By end of 2025, most enterprise applications now have embedded AI assistants that simplify tasks and answer questions. These assistants require human input but dramatically speed up common workflows. Think of the "Ask AI" buttons appearing in platforms like Salesforce, Microsoft 365, and Google Workspace.

    22026: Task-Specific Agents (40% of Apps)

    This is the 40% milestone. Task-specific agents handle complex, end-to-end operations without constant human oversight. A cybersecurity agent, for example, might scan network traffic, identify threats, and initiate responses autonomously. For nonprofits, this means donor cultivation agents that follow up automatically, grant deadline monitoring agents, or volunteer scheduling agents that fill shifts without staff involvement.

    32027: Collaborative Agents Across Systems

    By 2027, Gartner predicts one-third of agentic AI implementations will combine multiple specialized agents to manage complex tasks. This means an agent handling grant research might automatically hand off findings to an agent that drafts language for a proposal, which in turn notifies the finance agent to update budget projections.

    42028: AI Ecosystems Across Applications

    By 2028, 33% of enterprise software will include agentic AI that operates dynamically across multiple platforms simultaneously. Your CRM, grant management tool, and email system could all be coordinated by a single agent ecosystem managing end-to-end donor journeys.

    52029: Knowledge Workers Govern Their Own Agents

    Gartner predicts at least half of knowledge workers will be expected to create, govern, and deploy their own AI agents on demand by 2029. This has profound implications for how nonprofits hire, train, and evaluate staff across every department.

    What's Already Changing in Your Nonprofit's Software

    The Gartner prediction isn't theoretical. Major platforms that nonprofits rely on every day have already begun embedding agentic capabilities. Understanding what's available now, and what's coming soon, helps you make smarter decisions about how to configure, train for, and govern these tools.

    Salesforce Agentforce for Nonprofits

    Salesforce launched Agentforce Nonprofit in December 2025 with four purpose-built AI agents designed specifically for the sector. These aren't generic tools: they're configured for the unique workflows of mission-driven organizations. Nonprofits receive 10 free Agentforce licenses through the Power of Us Program.

    • Prospect Research Agent helps fundraisers understand donor wealth, philanthropic interests, and upcoming gift opportunities in Slack, eliminating hours of manual research
    • Volunteer Capacity agents automatically match volunteers to open shifts based on skills, availability, and location
    • Participant Management agents summarize client histories, document interactions, and flag service referrals during live case manager sessions
    • Early adopters report a 50% reduction in administrative time; America On Tech's grant reporting agent generates customized funder reports in under one hour, previously a multi-day process

    Blackbaud AI and Raiser's Edge NXT

    Blackbaud, the dominant CRM provider for nonprofits, partnered with Anthropic in December 2025 to become the first nonprofit CRM to integrate directly with Claude. This partnership draws on Blackbaud's 40+ years of nonprofit performance data including donor behavior, giving patterns, and campaign outcomes.

    • The Blackbaud Connector for Claude lets staff access donor records, events, and gifts using natural language commands directly in the Claude interface
    • A Development Agent (in early access) automates major gift cultivation by guiding users through opportunity creation and action scheduling
    • AI-generated donor acknowledgment letters and personalized outreach drafted from individual giving history

    Microsoft 365 Copilot

    Microsoft's Copilot is embedded across the entire 365 suite, which means nonprofits using Teams, Word, Excel, Outlook, and SharePoint already have access to an increasingly agentic AI layer. Copilot can now execute multi-step tasks across applications, not just respond to single prompts.

    • Summarizes emails, schedules meetings, and drafts responses autonomously
    • Analyzes Excel data and generates reports without manual formatting
    • Nonprofit discounts available through TechSoup reduce cost barriers

    Grant Management and Program Platforms

    Platforms serving nonprofit grant management, impact measurement, and program delivery are also embedding agents. These tools can monitor deadlines, flag compliance issues, and generate routine reports without staff prompting.

    • Automated grant deadline and reporting reminders
    • AI-assisted narrative generation from outcome data
    • Compliance monitoring that flags issues before deadlines

    The common thread across all these platforms is that AI capabilities are being embedded into existing subscriptions, not offered as separate add-ons requiring new purchasing decisions. This means the question isn't whether your organization will have access to AI agents. It's whether you're prepared to use them wisely, and whether you have governance structures in place to ensure they operate in alignment with your mission and values.

    What Agentic AI Can Actually Do for Nonprofits

    To understand why this matters so much for resource-constrained organizations, consider the difference between AI that responds to questions and AI that takes action. Current AI assistants are powerful, but they require humans to initiate every interaction, review every output, and take every action. Agentic AI changes this equation by operating autonomously across defined workflows.

    This is particularly significant for nonprofits because many organizations are managing workloads that exceed their human capacity. If AI agents can handle the high-volume, routine tasks, it frees staff for relationship-building, strategic thinking, and direct service work that requires human judgment and empathy. The potential to effectively multiply the impact of a small team is substantial.

    Fundraising and Donor Relations

    Autonomous donor outreach, cultivation, and stewardship

    The most immediate impact for many nonprofits will be in fundraising. AI agents can monitor donor engagement patterns, identify when relationships are cooling, and initiate personalized outreach without a development officer needing to review every contact record manually. A fundraising agent might notice that a major donor who gave at this time last year hasn't been engaged recently, draft a personalized note based on their history, and schedule it for review by a human staff member before sending.

    • Automated segmentation and personalized appeal drafting based on donor history
    • Real-time monitoring of lapsed donor indicators before gifts are lost
    • Automated thank-you sequences and stewardship touchpoints at scale
    • Prospect research and qualification without manual database work

    Volunteer Management and Program Delivery

    Autonomous scheduling, coordination, and service tracking

    Volunteer coordination is one of the most time-intensive administrative functions in many nonprofits. Matching volunteers to shifts, communicating about cancellations, tracking hours, and ensuring coverage for programs requires constant attention. AI agents can handle most of this autonomously, contacting volunteers, filling gaps in the schedule, and updating records without human intervention for routine situations.

    • Automatic shift filling based on volunteer skills, availability, and preferences
    • Proactive communication with volunteers about upcoming opportunities
    • Automated hours tracking and impact reporting without data entry burden
    • Service delivery tracking that updates case records without staff manual input

    Grant Management and Compliance

    Proactive monitoring, reminders, and reporting support

    Grant management is another area where agentic AI can provide significant relief. Tracking multiple grants with different reporting requirements, deadlines, and compliance obligations is a genuine administrative burden. AI agents can monitor these obligations continuously, flag upcoming deadlines, identify compliance gaps, and even draft sections of routine reports from existing data sources.

    • Continuous monitoring of grant compliance requirements and deadline tracking
    • AI-assisted narrative generation pulling from program outcome data
    • Budget vs. actual monitoring with proactive alerts for variance

    Risks Nonprofits Must Take Seriously

    Gartner itself has issued a sobering counterpoint to its positive predictions: a separate 2025 forecast states that over 40% of agentic AI projects will be canceled by end of 2027 due to inadequate governance, escalating costs, and ethical concerns that were not anticipated at launch. This is a reminder that enthusiasm for agentic AI needs to be paired with genuine caution.

    For nonprofits, the risks are amplified by the nature of the populations served. When an AI agent makes an error in a commercial context, it might result in a lost sale. When an AI agent makes an error in a social services context, it might affect a vulnerable person's access to housing, food, or healthcare. The stakes are not equal across all use cases.

    Bias and Inequity in Automated Decisions

    AI agents make decisions based on patterns in historical data. If that data reflects historical inequities in service delivery, funding, or program access, agents will perpetuate and potentially amplify those inequities. Organizations serving marginalized communities face particular risk when automating decisions about who receives services, which donors get premium attention, or which programs are recommended for expansion.

    Sensitive Data Exposure

    Agentic AI often requires broad access to organizational systems to function effectively. A fundraising agent that can send emails on behalf of staff needs access to donor records, email accounts, and possibly financial systems. This level of access increases the potential damage from security breaches and creates new data governance obligations that many nonprofits aren't currently equipped to handle.

    Mission Drift Through Automation

    AI agents optimize for the metrics they're given, not for values they can't measure. An agent optimizing donor retention might prioritize wealthy donors with strong giving histories, inadvertently deprioritizing grassroots fundraising and small-dollar donors who are often essential to community-based nonprofits. Without careful governance, automation can quietly reshape organizational priorities in ways that aren't aligned with stated mission.

    Accountability Gaps

    When an autonomous agent takes an action that harms a donor relationship, a beneficiary, or a funder partnership, who is accountable? Current governance frameworks at most nonprofits don't address this question adequately. Boards and executive leaders need to establish clear lines of responsibility before deploying agentic capabilities, not after an incident occurs.

    How to Prepare Your Nonprofit for the Agentic Era

    Preparation doesn't require large budgets or technical expertise. It requires intentional leadership and a willingness to engage with these questions before circumstances force your hand. Organizations that have already built foundations through earlier AI adoption, as explored in the AI champions framework and nonprofit leaders' guide to AI, are well positioned to navigate this transition. Here are the most important steps.

    Step 1: Audit Your Current Software for Agentic Capabilities

    Before you can develop a strategy, you need to know what you're working with. Most organizations are already paying for AI agent capabilities they haven't activated. Conduct a systematic review of every platform your organization subscribes to and identify which ones have announced or are rolling out agentic features.

    • Review release notes and roadmaps for your CRM, grant management, email, and office productivity tools
    • Ask your software vendors directly what agentic features are planned and when
    • Identify which features are already enabled versus requiring opt-in or additional configuration
    • Determine what data each agent will need access to and whether current data governance policies address this

    Step 2: Update Your AI Policy for Agentic Context

    Most nonprofit AI policies written in 2023 or 2024 were designed for an era of prompt-and-response AI. They typically address disclosure, accuracy verification, and data input concerns. These policies don't adequately address AI that takes autonomous action on your behalf. Your policy needs to be updated for the agentic era.

    • Define which categories of action agents may and may not take autonomously
    • Establish human review requirements for high-stakes actions like donor communications or service allocation decisions
    • Create audit and logging requirements so you can review what agents have done
    • Assign accountability clearly so staff know who is responsible for agentic outputs

    Step 3: Invest in Staff Literacy, Not Just Tool Training

    Gartner's prediction that half of knowledge workers will need to govern their own agents by 2029 represents a major shift in what it means to be "good at your job" in a nonprofit. Staff who understand how to direct, monitor, and correct AI agents will be significantly more effective than those who don't. This requires literacy investments that go deeper than basic tool training. Connecting with your AI champions is a good starting point for building this capability systematically.

    • Help staff understand what agents can and can't do, and where human judgment remains essential
    • Train staff to review and correct agent outputs rather than accepting them uncritically
    • Build skills for configuring agents effectively through clear instructions and constraints

    Step 4: Start with Low-Stakes, High-Volume Use Cases

    The best first deployments for agentic AI are areas where errors are recoverable, volume is high, and human review is practical. Volunteer scheduling, routine donor acknowledgments, and meeting summarization are all good starting points. These let your team build familiarity with how agents behave before deploying them in higher-stakes contexts like program service decisions or major donor communications.

    Build confidence and competency gradually. Organizations that rush into full agentic deployment without this foundation are the ones most likely to create the incidents that show up in Gartner's canceled-project statistics.

    What Boards and Executive Leaders Need to Address

    The shift toward agentic AI is not primarily a technology decision. It's a governance decision. When AI systems can take autonomous action on behalf of your organization, the board and executive team become accountable for those actions in ways that require proactive policy-setting, not reactive damage control.

    Forward-thinking boards are already beginning to add "AI governance" as a standing agenda item, reviewing AI policy updates as they would review financial policy updates. They're asking questions like: What AI agents are currently operating in our organization? What can they do autonomously? Who is accountable when they make mistakes? Do our insurance policies cover AI-related errors or harms?

    Executive directors and senior leaders have an equally important role in modeling thoughtful engagement with agentic tools. When leadership communicates clearly about both the potential and the constraints of these technologies, it helps staff navigate the uncertainty that comes with rapid change. The anxiety management strategies explored in managing AI anxiety in nonprofits apply here: clear, honest communication about what is changing, what the boundaries are, and what role humans continue to play is essential.

    The organizations that will fare best in the agentic era are those where leadership engages with these tools seriously, not those that either adopt them uncritically or avoid them until they have no choice. The three-to-six-month window that Gartner identified as critical for defining an agentic AI strategy is not exclusively for software vendors. It applies equally to nonprofit leaders who want to shape how these tools are deployed rather than simply react to what vendors have already decided.

    The Takeaway for Nonprofit Leaders

    Gartner's 40% prediction is not a reason to panic, and it's not a reason to wait and see. It's a clear signal that the nature of nonprofit work is changing in a fundamental way. The tools that run your operations are acquiring the ability to act autonomously, and whether that serves your mission or creates new problems depends heavily on the choices you make in the next twelve to twenty-four months.

    The good news for nonprofits is that you don't need to build agentic systems from scratch. The platforms you already use are being upgraded. Your primary work is governance: deciding which agents to enable, establishing boundaries on autonomous action, building staff capacity to work with and oversee these systems, and connecting agent performance metrics back to mission outcomes, not just operational efficiency.

    The organizations that will benefit most from agentic AI are those that approach it with the same rigor they apply to program design: starting with clear goals, building in accountability structures, monitoring for unintended consequences, and staying committed to the human relationships that sit at the heart of effective nonprofit work. Technology can expand your capacity. It can't replace your judgment or your values.

    Ready to Build Your Agentic AI Strategy?

    One Hundred Nights helps nonprofit leaders navigate the AI transition with clarity and confidence. From governance frameworks to staff training, we can help your organization harness agentic AI responsibly.