Major Gift Proposal Development: Using AI for Custom High-Dollar Proposals
Major gift fundraising represents one of the most favorable environments for individual philanthropy in decades. With a strong stock market, historic generational wealth transfer, and favorable tax laws converging, the opportunity for transformational gifts has never been greater. Yet crafting truly personalized, compelling proposals that resonate with high-net-worth donors remains one of the most time-intensive aspects of development work. This is where AI can transform your approach—not by replacing the essential human relationship, but by enabling development officers to create deeply customized proposals at a scale previously impossible.

Major gift proposals differ fundamentally from general case statements or standard grant applications. While those documents cast a wide net, major gift proposals must speak directly to one individual's philanthropic vision, values, and goals. They require deep knowledge of the donor's interests, preferred communication style, giving history, and personal motivations. This level of personalization is non-negotiable—today's high-net-worth donors expect meaningful, customized interactions that reflect their priorities.
The challenge lies in balancing thoroughness with efficiency. Development teams often manage portfolios of 50-150 major gift prospects simultaneously, each requiring distinct cultivation strategies and personalized proposals. Writing a single high-quality major gift proposal can take anywhere from 8-20 hours, depending on complexity. For small development teams, this creates an impossible bottleneck: you either sacrifice personalization for volume, or limit the number of prospects you can actively cultivate.
AI-powered proposal development doesn't eliminate the need for relationship building or strategic thinking. Instead, it handles the mechanically intensive aspects of proposal creation—analyzing donor data, drafting customized sections, ensuring consistency with your case for support, and adapting language to match donor preferences. This allows development officers to focus their expertise where it matters most: building authentic relationships, conducting meaningful discovery conversations, and making strategic decisions about cultivation approaches.
This guide explores how nonprofits can leverage AI throughout the major gift proposal development process, from initial donor research to final proposal customization, while maintaining the authenticity and personal touch that major donors expect and deserve.
Understanding the 2026 Major Gift Landscape
Before diving into AI applications, it's essential to understand the current major gift environment and what donors expect. The convergence of economic and demographic factors has created what many fundraising experts call "one of the most favorable environments for individual philanthropy in decades." However, this opportunity comes with heightened donor expectations around personalization, transparency, and impact reporting.
High-net-worth donors increasingly use sophisticated tools themselves—including AI-powered wealth management platforms, donor-advised fund analytics, and impact measurement dashboards. They expect nonprofits to demonstrate similar sophistication in their approach while maintaining the deeply personal touch that characterizes major gift relationships. This creates a paradox: donors want both high-touch personalization and data-driven insights, both relationship focus and operational efficiency.
Market Dynamics
- Wealth Transfer: An estimated $84 trillion will transfer between generations over the next two decades, with significant philanthropic implications
- DAF Growth: Donor-advised funds remain a widely used philanthropic vehicle, requiring specialized cultivation approaches
- Market Strength: Strong equity markets have increased capacity for gifts of appreciated securities and complex assets
- Portfolio Focus: Development teams are shifting from mass appeals to managing portfolios of high-value relationships
Donor Expectations
- Bespoke Stewardship: Older high-net-worth donors still prefer relationship-driven, customized engagement experiences
- Impact Transparency: Donors expect clear, data-driven reporting on how their gifts create measurable change
- Values Alignment: Proposals must clearly connect to the donor's personal philanthropic philosophy and priorities
- Hybrid Engagement: Donors value both in-person relationship moments and efficient digital communication
The Major Gift Proposal Development Challenge
Creating a major gift proposal is fundamentally different from writing a foundation grant or corporate sponsorship request. A major gift proposal is a highly personal document that must accomplish multiple objectives simultaneously: demonstrate deep understanding of the donor's values, articulate a compelling vision for impact, provide sufficient detail to justify the investment, and do all of this in a voice and format that resonates with this specific individual.
The traditional proposal development process involves extensive research, multiple drafts, internal reviews, customization based on relationship knowledge, and careful refinement of messaging. For a $100,000+ ask, this level of care is absolutely justified. The challenge emerges when you're managing 20, 50, or 100 major gift prospects at various stages of cultivation, each requiring similarly thoughtful proposals tailored to their unique circumstances.
Time Investment for Traditional Proposal Development
The hidden costs of manual proposal creation
Donor Research & Analysis (2-4 hours)
Review of giving history, wealth screening data, past interactions, philanthropic interests, and relationship notes. For newer prospects, this may include LinkedIn research, foundation 990 reviews, and public records analysis.
Strategic Framing (1-2 hours)
Determining which programs or initiatives align with donor interests, deciding on ask amount and payment structure, and identifying the most compelling impact metrics and stories to include.
Proposal Drafting (3-6 hours)
Writing customized sections on organizational background, program description, budget and financial projections, impact measurement approach, and donor recognition options. Each section must be tailored to this specific donor's priorities and communication preferences.
Internal Review & Refinement (1-3 hours)
Circulation to program staff for accuracy verification, executive director review for strategic alignment, finance team validation of budget figures, and incorporation of feedback from multiple stakeholders.
Personalization & Polish (1-2 hours)
Final adjustments to tone and voice, addition of personal touches based on relationship knowledge, creation of appendices and supporting materials, and formatting for professional presentation.
Total: 8-17 hours per proposal, not including follow-up revisions or presentation preparation
For a development director managing 75 major gift prospects and aiming to cultivate 20 new asks per year, this time investment creates a fundamental capacity constraint. Even assuming the lower end of the time range (8 hours), that's 160 hours annually just for proposal drafting—equivalent to four full weeks of work dedicated solely to this one task. This doesn't account for the actual relationship cultivation, meetings, events, stewardship activities, and all the other essential aspects of major gifts work.
The result is often a forced choice between quality and quantity. Some development teams create highly customized proposals for only their very top prospects (typically $250,000+), while using more templated approaches for smaller major gifts. Others attempt to maintain high customization across all prospects but can only manage a limited number of active solicitations at any given time. Neither approach is ideal—you either leave money on the table by not properly cultivating mid-level major donors, or you constrain your fundraising pipeline by focusing too narrowly.
This is precisely where AI can provide transformational value. By automating the most time-intensive mechanical tasks—pulling together donor research, drafting initial proposal sections, adapting language to match donor communication preferences—AI enables development professionals to maintain high personalization standards across a much larger prospect pool. The key is understanding what AI does well and where human judgment remains essential.
How AI Transforms Proposal Development
AI tools designed for grant writing and proposal development have matured significantly. Platforms like Grant Assistant (by FreeWill), Grantable, and Instrumentl Apply now offer purpose-built features specifically for nonprofit fundraising. Meanwhile, general-purpose AI tools like Claude, ChatGPT, and Microsoft Copilot can be effectively adapted for major gift proposals when used with proper prompting and oversight.
The most successful implementations don't treat AI as a "proposal writing robot" that generates finished documents at the push of a button. Instead, they use AI strategically throughout the proposal development workflow—for research synthesis, section drafting, language refinement, and customization—while maintaining human oversight at every critical decision point.
Donor Research & Intelligence Synthesis
From scattered data to actionable insights
One of AI's most powerful applications is synthesizing disparate donor information into coherent intelligence summaries. Your CRM might contain years of interaction notes, event attendance records, giving history, and relationship manager observations. Public sources might include LinkedIn profiles, foundation 990s, news mentions, and company backgrounds. Pulling all this information together manually is tedious and time-consuming.
AI can rapidly analyze this information and generate comprehensive donor profiles that highlight key patterns, interests, and cultivation opportunities. For example, you might prompt an AI tool with: "Review all interaction notes for [Donor Name] over the past three years and identify their top three philanthropic priorities, preferred communication style, and any family or business considerations that should inform our proposal approach."
What AI Can Extract:
- Patterns in giving behavior (timing, amounts, program preferences)
- Communication preferences (formal vs. casual, data-driven vs. story-focused)
- Connection points to your mission (personal experiences, family history, professional expertise)
- Philanthropic strategy indicators (risk tolerance, time horizon, involvement preferences)
- Relationship dynamics (decision-making process, influencers, family foundation involvement)
Proposal Section Drafting
Accelerating initial content creation
Once you've determined your strategic approach, AI can draft initial versions of standard proposal sections, customized based on donor intelligence. This is particularly valuable for sections that require substantial narrative explanation but follow recognizable structures—organizational background, program descriptions, budget narratives, and impact measurement frameworks.
For example, you might provide an AI tool with your organization's case for support, the donor profile you've developed, and a specific program you want to highlight. The AI can then draft a program description that emphasizes aspects most relevant to this donor's interests, uses language aligned with their communication preferences, and structures information in a format that matches their decision-making style.
Effective Prompting for Section Drafting:
- Provide context: Share your full case for support, relevant program materials, and donor intelligence summary
- Specify tone: Indicate whether the donor prefers formal/professional language or conversational/personal style
- Define structure: Request specific organizational approaches (problem-solution-impact, narrative arc, data-driven analysis)
- Emphasize connections: Highlight specific donor interests or values that should be woven throughout
- Request alternatives: Ask for 2-3 different approaches so you can select the most compelling framing
The key is treating AI output as a first draft, not a final product. Development professionals should review, refine, and personalize every section based on their relationship knowledge and strategic judgment. The value is in reducing the time from blank page to working draft from hours to minutes.
Language & Voice Customization
Matching donor communication preferences
One of the most sophisticated applications of AI in proposal development is adapting language and voice to match individual donor preferences. Some donors respond to data-heavy, analytical presentations. Others prefer emotional storytelling and narrative impact. Still others want concise, executive-summary-style communications. Reading this preference correctly can significantly influence proposal receptivity.
AI tools can analyze examples of the donor's own writing (emails, foundation guidelines, LinkedIn posts) or communications they've responded positively to in the past, then adapt your proposal language to mirror those patterns. This isn't about manipulation—it's about reducing friction and ensuring your message resonates in the way the donor naturally processes information.
Voice Customization Approaches:
- Formality calibration: Adjust from highly professional to warmly conversational based on your relationship history
- Data density: Increase or decrease quantitative information based on donor analytical preferences
- Narrative emphasis: Lead with stories vs. lead with outcomes based on what has resonated in past communications
- Length and detail: Comprehensive documentation vs. executive summaries with appendices
- Terminology alignment: Use industry terms the donor knows vs. explaining technical concepts in accessible language
Impact Framing & Metrics Selection
Highlighting outcomes that matter most to each donor
Different donors care about different impact dimensions. Some focus on scale (number of people served), others on depth (quality of outcomes), still others on innovation (new approaches to persistent problems) or efficiency (cost per outcome). Your organization likely tracks dozens of impact metrics across various programs. The art of proposal development is selecting and framing the metrics that will be most compelling to this specific donor.
AI can help match your impact data to donor priorities. By analyzing the donor's philanthropic history, stated interests, and past responses to your communications, AI can suggest which outcomes to emphasize and how to frame them. This ensures that your proposal leads with the most relevant impact story rather than defaulting to generic organizational metrics.
AI-Assisted Impact Framing:
- Outcome mapping: Connect your program outcomes to the donor's stated philanthropic goals and theory of change
- Metric prioritization: Identify which of your impact indicators align most closely with the donor's priorities
- Comparison context: Determine whether to emphasize year-over-year growth, peer comparisons, or absolute impact based on donor perspective
- Story selection: Choose beneficiary stories or program examples that illustrate the impact dimensions this donor values most
- Visualization recommendations: Suggest whether to present impact through charts, infographics, narrative case examples, or financial metrics
Practical Implementation: A Step-by-Step Workflow
Integrating AI into your major gift proposal development process requires thoughtful workflow design. The most effective approach treats AI as a collaborative tool that amplifies your expertise rather than replacing your judgment. Here's a proven workflow that balances efficiency with the personalization and strategic thinking that major gifts require.
Step 1: Donor Intelligence Gathering (30-45 minutes)
Begin by assembling all available information about your prospect. This includes CRM data, interaction notes, giving history, wealth screening results, and any public information (LinkedIn profiles, foundation 990s, news mentions, professional backgrounds).
AI Application: Use an AI tool to synthesize this information into a comprehensive donor profile. Upload relevant documents and notes, then prompt: "Analyze all provided information about [Donor Name] and create a comprehensive profile that includes: (1) their top 3-5 philanthropic priorities based on giving history and stated interests, (2) their preferred communication style and decision-making approach, (3) their connection points to our mission, (4) any family, business, or personal considerations that should inform our proposal strategy, and (5) recommended framing approaches for our ask."
Human Review: Validate the AI's analysis against your relationship knowledge. AI can identify patterns in data, but you know the nuances of personal conversations, unspoken preferences, and context that doesn't appear in written records.
Step 2: Strategic Framing Decision (20-30 minutes)
Based on your donor intelligence, make strategic decisions about your proposal approach: which program or initiative to highlight, what ask amount to request, what payment structure to suggest, and what impact outcomes to emphasize.
AI Application: Present the AI with your donor profile and your organization's program portfolio. Ask it to recommend which programs best align with the donor's interests and suggest 2-3 different framing approaches. For example: "Given this donor's interest in early childhood education and preference for data-driven impact measurement, which of our three literacy programs would be the strongest match, and what would be the most compelling way to frame the impact opportunity?"
Human Decision: The AI can surface options and highlight connections, but you make the final strategic call based on relationship dynamics, organizational priorities, timing considerations, and cultivation strategy.
Step 3: Proposal Structure & Section Drafting (1-2 hours)
With your strategic framework established, begin developing the actual proposal content. Standard sections typically include: executive summary, organizational background, program description, budget and financial information, impact measurement approach, donor recognition options, and next steps.
AI Application: Use AI to draft initial versions of each section, customized to your donor profile. Provide the AI with your case for support, program materials, and donor intelligence, then request section drafts with specific guidance about tone, emphasis, and structure. Work section by section, refining prompts based on initial outputs.
Example Prompt: "Draft the program description section for our early literacy initiative, customized for a donor who values measurable outcomes, prefers concise professional communication, and has a background in education research. Emphasize our evidence-based curriculum approach and longitudinal outcome tracking. Keep the tone professional but warm, and structure the content as problem-approach-impact. Length: 800-1000 words."
Human Refinement: Treat AI output as a first draft. Add specific examples from your relationship with the donor, incorporate recent conversations or shared experiences, adjust language to match your authentic voice, and ensure accuracy of all programmatic and financial details.
Step 4: Personalization Layer (30-60 minutes)
This is where the proposal transforms from well-crafted to truly personal. Add elements that can only come from your direct relationship with the donor—references to specific conversations, acknowledgment of their previous support, connections to their personal story or professional expertise, and thoughtful touches that demonstrate genuine understanding.
What to Add:
- Opening paragraph that references a recent conversation, site visit, or shared moment
- Connections between the proposal content and the donor's professional expertise or personal interests
- Acknowledgment of their previous gifts and the specific impact those contributions created
- Invitation to engage in ways aligned with their preferences (site visits, advisory roles, impact reporting frequency)
- Personal note from your executive director or board member who has a relationship with the donor
This personalization layer cannot be automated. It requires genuine relationship knowledge and authentic connection. The time AI saves you in earlier steps enables you to invest adequately in this crucial final layer.
Step 5: Review, Refinement & Quality Assurance (30-45 minutes)
Before finalizing, conduct thorough quality review. Have relevant stakeholders review for accuracy (program staff), strategic alignment (executive leadership), financial correctness (finance team), and relationship appropriateness (anyone else who knows the donor well).
AI Application: Use AI for final quality checks: "Review this complete proposal and flag any sections where the tone shifts inconsistently, where the logic flow could be strengthened, where claims lack supporting evidence, or where the language feels generic rather than personalized."
Human Final Review: Read the entire proposal start to finish as if you were the donor. Does it speak to their priorities? Does it feel authentic and personal? Does it make a compelling case for this specific investment at this specific amount? Does every section reflect knowledge of who they are and what they care about?
Total Time Investment with AI: 3-5 hours (compared to 8-17 hours without AI), with substantially higher personalization quality because you can invest the time saved into relationship-specific touches rather than mechanical drafting.
Choosing the Right AI Tools
The AI tool landscape for proposal development includes both purpose-built grant writing platforms and general-purpose AI tools that can be adapted for major gift proposals. Your choice depends on budget, team size, technical comfort, and integration needs. Many organizations use a combination—purpose-built tools for workflow management and general-purpose AI for customization and refinement.
Purpose-Built Grant Writing Platforms
Specialized tools designed for nonprofit fundraising
Grant Assistant (by FreeWill)
Trained on over 7,000 winning grant proposals, Grant Assistant is specifically designed for nonprofit fundraising. It excels at analyzing RFP requirements and generating tailored responses. Users report completing proposals three times faster than traditional methods.
Best for: Organizations that submit numerous grant applications and need a tool that understands nonprofit language and funder expectations
Grantable
Combines AI drafting with collaborative workflow features. Brings together content, criteria, and team members in one platform, with flexible subscription plans that scale with organizational needs.
Best for: Development teams that need collaboration features and want to manage the entire proposal workflow in one system
Instrumentl Apply
Integrates AI drafting with a comprehensive grant workflow including research, opportunity matching, proposal structuring, team collaboration, deadline tracking, and reporting. Particularly strong for organizations managing multiple grant applications simultaneously.
Best for: Larger development teams that want end-to-end grant management with AI-powered drafting as one component
Grantboost
Focused specifically on generating customized grant proposal answers based on your inputs, incorporating industry best practices and proven grant writing strategies.
Best for: Smaller organizations seeking a straightforward, affordable AI writing assistant without complex workflow features
General-Purpose AI Tools Adapted for Proposals
Versatile platforms with broader capabilities
Claude (Anthropic)
Particularly strong for long-form writing and maintaining consistent voice across documents. Features like Projects allow you to maintain context across multiple proposal versions, and the large context window enables analysis of extensive donor research and organizational materials simultaneously.
Best for: Organizations that want flexibility, high-quality prose, and the ability to customize prompts extensively for different donor types
ChatGPT (OpenAI)
Widely accessible and familiar to many users. Excellent for brainstorming, summarizing research, and generating multiple framing options. Custom GPTs can be created with your organization's specific proposal templates and guidelines built in.
Best for: Teams already familiar with ChatGPT who want to extend their existing AI use to proposal development without learning new platforms
Microsoft Copilot
Seamlessly integrated with Microsoft 365, making it ideal for organizations that work primarily in Word and already use Microsoft tools. Can pull information directly from SharePoint, generate presentations in PowerPoint, and work within your existing document ecosystem.
Best for: Organizations heavily invested in the Microsoft ecosystem who want AI capabilities without changing their workflow or document management approach
Notion AI
Combines document organization, knowledge management, and AI assistance in one platform. Excellent for teams that want to maintain a searchable library of proposal components, donor intelligence, and program descriptions alongside their drafting tools.
Best for: Development teams that value integrated knowledge management and want proposal drafting connected to their organizational information repository
Selection Considerations
- Data privacy: Ensure the tool's data handling aligns with your donor privacy commitments and confidentiality requirements
- CRM integration: Consider whether the tool can connect to your existing donor database or requires manual data transfer
- Learning curve: Assess your team's technical comfort and time available for training
- Cost structure: Many tools offer nonprofit discounts; compare per-user pricing vs. organizational licenses
- Collaboration features: Determine whether you need multi-user editing, approval workflows, or version control
- Customization flexibility: Some tools work best "out of the box" while others require prompt engineering and customization
Many successful development teams use a hybrid approach: a purpose-built platform like Grantable or Instrumentl for managing the overall grant pipeline and workflow, combined with a general-purpose tool like Claude for high-touch customization of major gift proposals. This provides both structure and flexibility.
Critical Considerations & Ethical Guidelines
Using AI for major gift proposals raises important ethical and practical considerations. The fundamental principle is this: AI should enhance your authentic relationship with the donor, never replace it or manufacture false intimacy. Major gift fundraising is built on trust, and that trust requires genuine human connection and honest communication.
Donor Privacy & Data Security
When you upload donor information to an AI tool, you're sharing potentially sensitive personal data, financial information, and relationship details. Different AI platforms have different data handling policies—some store and may train on your inputs, while others offer enterprise options with stricter privacy protections.
- Review the AI tool's data privacy policy and terms of service before uploading donor information
- Consider anonymizing donor names in prompts when possible, using "Donor A" or similar designations
- For highly sensitive prospects, use tools with enterprise-grade privacy protections or work locally
- Never upload donor social security numbers, detailed financial account information, or legally protected data
- Establish team guidelines about what donor information can be shared with AI tools and what cannot
Authenticity & Transparency
Some donors are curious about AI use in fundraising, while others may find it off-putting. Research shows that 31% of donors give less when they know AI is involved, highlighting the importance of how you position and use these tools.
- Never claim personal authorship of entirely AI-generated content; always add your substantive input and personalization
- If donors ask about your use of technology in proposal development, be honest about AI as a research and drafting tool while emphasizing the human relationship
- Don't use AI to fabricate donor connections or interests that don't actually exist
- Ensure that personalization is based on real relationship knowledge, not just pattern-matching from data
- Consider developing an AI use policy that addresses donor communication and proposal development
Accuracy & Quality Control
AI can generate plausible-sounding content that contains factual errors, misrepresents your programs, or makes unsubstantiated claims. In a major gift proposal, accuracy is paramount—factual errors can destroy trust and credibility.
- Verify every factual claim, statistic, and program description in AI-generated content
- Have program staff review sections about their work for accuracy and appropriate representation
- Double-check all budget figures, timelines, and quantitative commitments
- Don't let AI efficiency pressure you to skip essential review steps
- Be cautious about AI-generated impact projections or outcome predictions—ensure these are realistic and evidence-based
Avoiding Over-Reliance
AI tools are powerful productivity enhancers, but they can't replace the human elements that make major gift fundraising successful: genuine relationships, intuitive understanding of donor motivations, nuanced judgment about timing and approach, and authentic passion for your mission.
- Use AI to save time on mechanical tasks, then invest that saved time in relationship building
- Don't let efficiency gains tempt you to reduce face-to-face cultivation time with donors
- Remember that AI can help you scale personalization, but it can't manufacture authentic connection
- Train junior development staff in fundamental proposal writing skills before introducing AI tools
- Periodically write proposals without AI assistance to maintain and develop your own skills
Connecting Proposal Development to Your Broader AI Strategy
Major gift proposal development doesn't exist in isolation—it's one component of your comprehensive development program and your organization's broader technology strategy. The most successful implementations integrate AI-powered proposal development with donor research, cultivation tracking, stewardship planning, and impact reporting.
If you're using AI for donor survey analysis, for example, those insights should inform your proposal customization. If you're implementing AI-powered knowledge management, your proposal templates and donor intelligence should be part of that system. If you're building AI champions across your organization, your development team should be actively involved.
Consider how proposal development AI connects to:
- Donor intelligence systems: AI tools that analyze giving patterns and predict capacity should feed directly into your proposal strategy
- Stewardship automation: Proposals should trigger customized stewardship sequences when funded
- Impact reporting: The metrics and outcomes you promise in proposals should align with your measurement and reporting systems
- Board communications: Major gift pipeline reporting should leverage the same donor intelligence that informs your proposals
- Strategic planning: Your strategic planning process should consider how AI enables expansion of major gift capacity
This integrated approach ensures that efficiency gains in proposal development translate into broader organizational impact rather than remaining siloed within the development function.
Measuring Success: Beyond Time Savings
While time savings are the most immediate and visible benefit of AI-powered proposal development, they're not the only metric that matters. A comprehensive evaluation considers multiple dimensions of success across efficiency, effectiveness, and relationship quality.
Key Performance Indicators for AI-Powered Proposal Development
Efficiency Metrics
- Average time per proposal: Track reduction from baseline (should decrease 40-60%)
- Number of active proposals in development: Capacity should increase as bottleneck reduces
- Time from cultivation ready to proposal delivery: Should decrease as drafting becomes faster
Effectiveness Metrics
- Proposal acceptance rate: Should remain stable or improve (if it decreases, quality may be suffering)
- Average gift size: Better customization may lead to larger commitments
- Proposal revision requests: Fewer revisions suggest better initial customization
- Time to decision: Well-crafted proposals may reduce donor decision time
Relationship Quality Metrics
- Donor feedback on proposals: Qualitative assessment of personalization and relevance
- Development officer satisfaction: Are staff able to invest more time in relationship building?
- Cultivation touches per prospect: Time saved should enable more donor contact
- Donor retention and upgrade rates: Ultimately, better proposals should strengthen relationships
Strategic Capacity Metrics
- Portfolio size per development officer: Can staff manage larger portfolios with AI support?
- New prospect cultivation rate: Reduced bottleneck should allow faster pipeline development
- Time invested in strategic activities: Are development officers doing more high-value work?
Establish baseline metrics before implementing AI tools, then track consistently. Review quarterly to ensure that efficiency gains are translating into increased fundraising capacity and stronger donor relationships, not just faster proposal production.
Getting Started: A Phased Implementation Approach
Don't try to transform your entire proposal development process overnight. The most successful implementations start small, learn from experience, and scale gradually. This phased approach reduces risk, builds team confidence, and allows you to refine your approach based on real results.
Phase 1: Pilot with Low-Stakes Proposals (Month 1-2)
Begin with proposals where the relationship risk is lower—perhaps $25,000-$50,000 asks to donors who don't require highly complex customization, or renewal proposals to existing supporters. This lets you experiment and refine your approach without jeopardizing your most important prospect relationships.
- Select 3-5 pilot proposals with moderate complexity
- Choose one AI tool to test (general-purpose or purpose-built based on budget)
- Document your workflow and track time investment
- Gather feedback from development staff on ease of use and output quality
- Evaluate donor responses (both to the proposal itself and to conversation about your process if it comes up)
Phase 2: Expand & Refine (Month 3-4)
Based on your pilot results, refine your workflow and expand to a broader range of proposals. This is when you develop standardized prompts, create reusable templates, and train additional team members.
- Create a library of effective prompts for different donor types and proposal sections
- Develop guidelines for what donor information is appropriate to share with AI tools
- Train all development team members on the workflow and tools
- Expand to include more complex proposals, potentially including six-figure asks
- Continue tracking metrics and gathering qualitative feedback
Phase 3: Full Integration (Month 5+)
AI-powered proposal development becomes standard practice across all major gift solicitations. You're now optimizing the workflow, measuring strategic impact, and potentially expanding AI use to related development functions.
- Incorporate AI proposal development into new staff onboarding and training
- Evaluate whether saved time is translating into increased donor contact and relationship quality
- Consider expanding to related applications (donor research, stewardship communications, impact reporting)
- Regularly review and update your prompt library and workflow based on ongoing experience
- Assess whether you have capacity to expand major gift portfolio sizes or increase cultivation pace
Conclusion: Scaling Personalization Without Losing the Personal
The fundamental challenge of major gift fundraising has always been balancing the demand for deeply personalized proposals with the practical constraints of development team capacity. AI doesn't resolve this tension by making personalization unnecessary—it resolves it by making genuine personalization scalable.
When implemented thoughtfully, AI-powered proposal development enables development professionals to create custom, donor-specific proposals for 50, 75, or 100 prospects that previously would have received templated approaches or wouldn't have been actively cultivated at all due to capacity constraints. This isn't about doing the same work faster; it's about fundamentally expanding what's possible within existing resource constraints.
The most successful implementations share common characteristics: they maintain rigorous quality control, they invest time saved from mechanical tasks into relationship building, they respect donor privacy and data security, they remain authentic in all communications, and they view AI as a tool that amplifies human expertise rather than replacing human judgment.
As you develop your approach to AI-powered proposal development, keep the end goal in clear focus: stronger donor relationships, more successful solicitations, and ultimately, greater resources to advance your mission. The technology is a means to that end, not the end itself. Every hour saved on proposal drafting should translate into an hour invested in donor cultivation, strategic planning, or relationship stewardship.
The 2026 major gift environment offers unprecedented opportunity for organizations that can combine relationship-driven cultivation with sophisticated, personalized proposals. AI makes it possible to deliver on both dimensions simultaneously—to be both high-touch and high-capacity, both deeply personal and operationally efficient. That combination positions your organization to fully capitalize on this favorable philanthropic moment and build sustainable major gift programs that will fuel your mission for years to come.
Ready to Transform Your Major Gift Proposal Development?
We help nonprofits implement AI-powered fundraising workflows that scale personalization without sacrificing relationship quality. From tool selection to workflow design to team training, we'll guide you through every step of the implementation process.
