How MCP Lets AI Talk to Your Existing Tools Without Custom Development
A new open standard called Model Context Protocol is quietly eliminating the biggest barrier to AI integration in nonprofits: the need for expensive custom development. Here is what it means for your organization.
For years, the pitch for AI in nonprofits came with a catch. Yes, AI can read your donor database, analyze your program outcomes, and draft personalized communications at scale. But connecting the AI to the systems where that data actually lives required custom coding, developer hours, and ongoing technical maintenance. For most nonprofits, that made the pitch theoretical rather than practical.
Model Context Protocol, or MCP, is changing that calculation fundamentally. Introduced by Anthropic in November 2024 and now backed by virtually every major technology company, MCP is an open standard that defines how AI systems connect to external tools and data sources. The practical effect: many of the AI integrations that used to require months of custom development now take minutes to set up, without writing a single line of code.
This article explains what MCP is, why it matters specifically for nonprofits, which tools already support it, and how your organization can start using it today. It also addresses the security considerations that deserve serious attention before you connect AI to systems containing donor or beneficiary data.
Understanding MCP does not require a technical background. What it requires is an appreciation for a persistent problem that has quietly held back AI adoption in resource-constrained organizations, and why a new architectural standard represents a genuine shift in what is now possible.
The Problem MCP Solves: Fragmented Integration
Before MCP, connecting an AI assistant to external tools required building what developers call a custom integration: a piece of software that translates between the AI's capabilities and a specific tool's API. Each integration had to be designed, built, tested, and maintained separately. If your nonprofit used Salesforce for donor management, Google Drive for documents, Slack for communication, and Asana for project tracking, and you wanted an AI that could access all four, you needed four separate custom integrations.
The technical community describes this as the N times M problem. If there are N different AI systems and M different tools they might need to connect with, the total number of custom integrations required is N multiplied by M. For a sector with hundreds of AI tools and thousands of software applications, this produces an unsustainable number of one-off connections, each expensive to build and fragile to maintain.
MCP resolves this mathematically. Instead of every AI building a custom connector to every tool, each tool builds one MCP server and each AI builds one MCP client. The total connections needed drops from N times M to N plus M. The USB-C analogy that has become standard in the industry captures this well: before USB-C, every device needed its own proprietary cable. The universal connector eliminated that chaos. MCP does the same for AI-to-tool connections.
Before and After MCP
How the integration landscape changed for nonprofits using AI
Before MCP
- Each AI-to-tool connection required custom developer code
- Integration costs ranged from thousands to tens of thousands of dollars
- Every tool update could break existing integrations
- Most nonprofits could not afford the technical resources
After MCP
- Tools build one MCP server; AI builds one MCP client
- Many connections require OAuth login only, no code
- Updates handled by tool vendors, not the nonprofit
- 50+ pre-built connectors available on Claude's free plan
How MCP Actually Works: A Plain-Language Explanation
MCP follows a three-part architecture. The host is the AI application where you do your work, such as Claude.ai or Claude Desktop. The client is a small piece of software built into the host that handles communication with external tools. The server is software that a tool vendor builds and runs alongside their product, whether that is Salesforce, Slack, or Google Drive, that translates the tool's capabilities into the MCP standard.
When you ask Claude a question that requires accessing an external tool, the process happens automatically: Claude identifies what it needs, sends a standardized request via the MCP client, the appropriate MCP server executes the action (reading a record, querying a database, or retrieving a document), and the result comes back to Claude to incorporate into its response.
MCP servers expose three types of capabilities. Tools are executable actions: creating a task in Asana, querying donor records in Salesforce, or posting a message to Slack. Resources are data the AI can read: documents in Google Drive, records in a database, or content from a knowledge base. Prompts are reusable workflow templates that guide the AI through common tasks consistently.
From a user perspective, this machinery is invisible. You interact with Claude normally, and when you ask something that requires your CRM or file storage, it simply works, provided the connection has been authorized.
A Day in the Life: MCP in Action for a Development Director
How connected AI changes what is possible without a single line of code
Morning: Grant Deadline Check
"Claude, what grant reporting deadlines do we have in the next 60 days?" Claude queries your Google Drive grant folder structure and Asana project timelines simultaneously, returning a prioritized summary without you opening either application.
Midday: Donor Renewal Outreach
"Who are our top 25 donors who gave last year but haven't given this year?" Claude queries Salesforce and returns a list. "Draft a personalized renewal email for each based on their giving history." Claude accesses each donor record and drafts 25 differentiated messages.
Afternoon: Board Meeting Prep
"Summarize last month's program updates from the staff Slack channel and combine with this quarter's outcome data from our Google Sheets tracker." Claude pulls from both sources and produces a board-ready narrative, saving hours of manual aggregation.
MCP Has Become the Industry Standard: Why That Matters
When Anthropic released MCP in November 2024, it was one company's open proposal. By early 2026, it has become the de facto standard for AI integration across the entire technology industry, which matters enormously for nonprofits thinking about long-term technology investments.
OpenAI adopted MCP in March 2025, integrating it into ChatGPT desktop and the Agents SDK. Microsoft announced MCP support in Windows 11 and GitHub Copilot at its May 2025 Build conference. Google DeepMind adopted MCP for Gemini. Cursor, Visual Studio Code, and Sourcegraph were early technical adopters. The protocol went from a single company's proposal to a cross-industry standard in under six months.
In December 2025, Anthropic donated MCP governance to the Agentic AI Foundation, a directed fund under the Linux Foundation, co-founded by Anthropic, Block, and OpenAI. Platinum members of that foundation include Amazon Web Services, Anthropic, Block, Bloomberg, Cloudflare, Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI. Gold members include Salesforce, SAP, Oracle, IBM, Cisco, Snowflake, and Docker. This is the same governance model that maintains HTTP, the protocol that underlies the web.
For nonprofits, the governance structure signals something important: MCP is not a proprietary vendor feature that can be discontinued when a company changes strategy. It is now a neutral industry standard. Investments in MCP-compatible tools and workflows are investments in infrastructure that will remain relevant for years.
MCP Ecosystem Growth
How rapidly the standard has been adopted since its November 2024 introduction
Tools Your Nonprofit Likely Already Uses That Support MCP
The most immediate practical question is whether the tools your organization depends on already have MCP servers available. For most nonprofits, the answer is encouraging. The majority of widely used nonprofit platforms either have official MCP support or are in the process of adding it.
Claude's pre-built connectors, available on all plans including the free tier, include Google Drive, Gmail, Google Calendar, Notion, Asana, Slack, Linear, Jira, Monday.com, Figma, Canva, GitHub, HubSpot, Stripe, and WordPress.com, with more than 50 integrations available as of early 2026. These connectors require no coding, only an OAuth authentication step similar to logging in with Google.
Salesforce released its official MCP server in May 2025, initially in developer preview, with its native Agentforce MCP client entering pilot in July 2025. This is significant for the substantial portion of larger nonprofits running Salesforce Nonprofit Cloud. Natural language queries against donor records, campaign history, and contact data became possible without custom Apex code or Salesforce reports.
HubSpot has an official HTTP MCP endpoint. Asana and Notion both have official SSE and HTTP MCP servers. For organizations that use Trello, Airtable, or other project management tools, the Composio platform provides a managed MCP marketplace with more than 100 tools accessible through a single integration point.
Donor Management and CRM
- Salesforce Nonprofit Cloud (official MCP server, May 2025)
- HubSpot (official HTTP endpoint)
- Airtable (via Composio managed MCP)
- PostgreSQL and other databases (official reference server)
Productivity and Communication
- Google Drive, Gmail, Google Calendar
- Slack (official connector)
- Notion (official HTTP server)
- Microsoft 365 (via Claude connectors)
Project and Program Management
- Asana (official SSE server)
- Jira (via Atlassian official support)
- Monday.com (via Claude connectors)
- Trello (via Composio MCP marketplace)
Finance and Fundraising
- Stripe (payment processing, official Claude connector)
- GitHub (for technical teams, official reference server)
- WordPress.com (for website management)
- 100+ more via Composio managed MCP marketplace
Practical Nonprofit Use Cases for MCP
The most compelling MCP applications for nonprofits are the ones that eliminate the tedious manual work of pulling information from multiple systems. Every organization has workflows where someone spends hours copying data between applications, cross-referencing reports, or synthesizing updates that live in different tools. MCP makes many of those tasks conversational.
Donor Stewardship and Fundraising
Connect Claude to your CRM and ask natural language questions that previously required running reports and exporting spreadsheets. A development director can ask which major donors have not given in 18 months, receive a list, and immediately ask for personalized renewal email drafts based on each donor's giving history, all without leaving the conversation. For organizations using AI champions who can teach these techniques to development staff, this represents a meaningful capability shift.
- Query lapsed donors by giving level, frequency, and last contact date
- Draft differentiated stewardship communications based on actual history
- Track pledge fulfillment without opening the CRM
Grant Management and Compliance
Nonprofits managing multiple grants simultaneously deal with a persistent challenge: each funder has different reporting requirements, deadlines, and deliverable definitions. MCP-connected AI can query your grant document library and project management system simultaneously, producing deadline summaries, identifying at-risk deliverables, and helping draft progress narratives. Organizations building AI-powered knowledge management systems find MCP particularly valuable for ensuring AI can access institutional knowledge without manual uploading.
- Monitor reporting deadlines across all active grants in real time
- Cross-reference program outcomes against grant deliverables
- Generate funder reports by pulling data from multiple sources simultaneously
Board and Leadership Reporting
One of the highest-value but least-discussed uses of MCP is board meeting preparation. Executive directors and development directors typically spend significant time manually aggregating data from program systems, financial tools, volunteer databases, and communication channels to produce board materials. With connected AI, much of this aggregation becomes a natural language conversation. Ask for a summary of program activity from the past quarter, pull the corresponding financial data, and request a narrative synthesis in a consistent voice. The board packet that took a day can be drafted in an afternoon.
- Synthesize program updates from Slack, Asana, and Google Drive simultaneously
- Generate consistent dashboards from multiple data sources without a data analyst
- Compare performance against prior periods using historical data in your systems
Knowledge Base Queries and Onboarding
Organizations with significant institutional knowledge stored in Google Drive, Notion, or SharePoint can use MCP to make that knowledge conversational. New staff members can ask the AI questions about organizational policies, past programs, or standard procedures and receive answers grounded in actual internal documents rather than generic AI responses. This is particularly valuable for organizations that have invested in strategic AI planning and want to accelerate the onboarding of new team members.
- Answer staff questions with references to actual internal documents
- Reduce repetitive questions to senior staff during busy periods
- Maintain consistent communication by grounding responses in approved messaging
How to Get Started: Three Levels of MCP Access
MCP access exists on a spectrum from genuinely no-code to technically involved. For most nonprofit use cases involving common platforms, the simplest approach is sufficient and requires no IT support.
1Level One: Pre-Built Connectors (No Technical Skill Required)
Claude's pre-built connectors are available on all plans, including free, and require only an OAuth authentication step, the same type of authorization as clicking "log in with Google." In Claude.ai, click the plus icon in the message input, select Connectors, browse the 50+ available integrations, and authenticate with your existing account. Once connected, you can immediately ask questions that access your Google Drive, Gmail, Notion workspace, or Asana projects.
This is the recommended starting point for most nonprofits. Begin with Google Drive and ask Claude to help you analyze documents, draft grant summaries from existing materials, or identify key information across your file library.
2Level Two: Desktop Extensions (Minimal Technical Skill)
Claude Desktop supports installable extensions that bundle all necessary components into a single package with a simple installation process. Navigate to Settings, then Extensions, and browse the directory. Single-click installation handles the technical setup. This approach supports a wider range of tools than the web connectors and is appropriate for staff who are comfortable installing software but do not have programming experience.
3Level Three: Custom or Local MCP Servers (Requires Technical Support)
Connecting to internal databases, proprietary systems, or community-built MCP servers requires editing configuration files and may require software runtimes like Node.js or Python. This level is appropriate for organizations with in-house technical staff or access to a skilled technical volunteer. The configuration itself is well-documented and not complex for someone with basic technical literacy, but it is not appropriate for unsupported non-technical staff.
For nonprofits with Salesforce running internally, Level Three access enables AI queries against your complete CRM dataset, unlocking the most powerful organizational use cases.
Security Considerations That Deserve Serious Attention
MCP's convenience creates genuine security responsibilities that organizations should address before connecting AI to systems containing donor or beneficiary data. The security considerations are real, and the nonprofit sector's obligations around data privacy make them especially important.
The most significant risk is prompt injection: a malicious actor could embed hidden instructions in a document the AI reads via MCP, potentially causing the AI to take unintended actions or expose data inappropriately. While Anthropic and other AI providers work to mitigate this, organizations should be thoughtful about which documents and systems they expose to MCP-connected AI.
The principle of least privilege applies here directly. Grant the AI only the permissions it actually needs for the tasks you intend. An AI assistant that needs to read grant documents in Google Drive does not need write access to your donor database. Configure each connection with the minimum permissions that enable the intended workflow.
The MCP ecosystem is still maturing from a security perspective. Research from 2025 found that a significant portion of community-built MCP servers used insecure authentication methods. The safest approach for nonprofits is to use only official, vendor-built MCP servers or connectors that appear in Claude's reviewed directory. Avoid installing community MCP servers without IT vetting, regardless of how useful they appear.
Security Best Practices for MCP
- Use only official vendor MCP servers or Anthropic's reviewed connector directory
- Apply least-privilege access: grant only the permissions needed for the specific workflow
- Avoid connecting MCP to systems with sensitive beneficiary PII until your security posture has been reviewed
- Maintain audit logs of what the AI accessed and what actions it took
- Establish organizational policies about which MCP connections staff may authorize independently
- Use Claude Team or Enterprise plans for organizational deployments, which offer centralized management and access controls
Data Governance Consideration
Before connecting MCP to systems containing client health information, immigration status, financial records, or other sensitive beneficiary data, consult with your legal counsel or a cybersecurity professional familiar with nonprofit compliance obligations. MCP connections to sensitive systems should be part of a deliberate data governance decision, not an exploratory experiment.
What MCP Cannot Do and Where Challenges Remain
An honest assessment of MCP requires acknowledging where the technology still has meaningful limitations. The no-code experience applies primarily to well-resourced tools with official MCP implementations. Connecting AI to legacy systems, proprietary databases, or older nonprofit software platforms may still require custom development.
Data quality surfaces as a consistent challenge. MCP makes it easier for AI to access your data; it does not make that data better. Organizations with duplicate donor records, inconsistent program data, or incomplete grant tracking will find that MCP-powered queries surface the mess more clearly. The investment in data quality that has always mattered for good reporting matters even more when AI can access that data conversationally. Consider reading about foundational AI readiness before scaling MCP connections.
Governance is an underappreciated challenge. As staff discover they can connect Claude to organizational systems with a simple OAuth login, the question of who decides which connections are authorized becomes urgent. Without clear policies, different team members may connect AI to the same systems in different ways, creating inconsistent security postures and audit challenges. Organizations that have developed structured AI governance will navigate this more smoothly than those still operating informally.
The integration is only as reliable as the underlying tools. If your Asana project management is inconsistently maintained, MCP-connected AI will faithfully reflect that inconsistency in its responses. This is an argument for improving data hygiene before expanding MCP access, not for avoiding MCP entirely.
Looking Ahead: MCP in 2026 and Beyond
Gartner projects that 75% of API gateway vendors and 50% of integration platform vendors will have native MCP features by 2026. This suggests that MCP support will become a standard feature of the software tools nonprofits already use, rather than a separate capability requiring configuration. The trajectory points toward a world where AI integration is simply built into the platforms organizations already purchase.
Enterprise-grade security features are the primary focus of 2026 MCP development. Centralized management, better audit logging, role-based access controls for MCP connections, and more robust authorization specifications are all active development priorities. For larger nonprofits concerned about governance, the enterprise controls that make MCP organizational-deployment-ready are coming to market rapidly.
The most important takeaway for nonprofit leaders is that MCP represents a genuine change in the integration economics for AI. The barrier of custom development that prevented most organizations from connecting AI to their actual data is being systematically eliminated, and the open governance structure of the Agentic AI Foundation means that this standard will persist regardless of which AI platforms organizations choose. Starting with simple connections now, building organizational competency, and developing appropriate governance policies positions organizations well for the more connected AI environment that is already arriving.
Conclusion
Model Context Protocol is not a new product to purchase or a complex implementation to plan. For most nonprofits, it is an immediate capability upgrade that exists within the tools and subscriptions already in place. The pre-built connectors available on Claude's free plan today can connect your AI assistant to Google Drive, Gmail, Slack, Notion, and Asana in minutes, with nothing more than an OAuth authorization.
The meaningful work is not technical. It is organizational: deciding which workflows benefit most from connected AI, establishing policies about which connections staff may authorize, developing the data hygiene that makes AI-generated insights trustworthy, and building the habits that help teams use connected AI effectively rather than sporadically.
Organizations that invest in understanding MCP now, even at the simplest level of exploring the available connectors, are positioning themselves for a world where AI's value comes not from isolated conversations but from its ability to understand and act on the full context of your organization's work. That world is already here for tools that support MCP, and it is expanding rapidly to cover the platforms that most nonprofits depend on.
Ready to Connect Your AI to Your Tools?
Our team helps nonprofits identify the highest-value MCP connections for their specific platforms and workflows, establish appropriate governance policies, and build the internal competencies that make connected AI sustainable.